Assessment Method for Weighting and Aggregation in Constructing Composite Indicators of Mixed Data

Authors

  • Arni Nurwida  Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, West Java, Indonesia
  • Aji Hamim Wigena  Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, West Java, Indonesia
  • Budi Susetyo  Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, West Java, Indonesia

Keywords:

Composite Indicators, Factor Analysis of Mixed Data, Geometric Aggregation, Household Welfare Status

Abstract

Composite indicators are often encountered in various studies, especially in the social sector. Composite indicators are constructed from several steps such as weighting and aggregation. The classical weighting method such as weighting based on factor analysis and regression analysis cannot handle a mixture of numeric and categoric variables. Furthermore, using a dependent variable as the estimator in weighting based on regression analysis is sometimes manipulated by respondents. An approach to address this problem uses the weighting method based on factor analysis of mixed data. The classical aggregation method such as linear additive aggregation cannot handle a mixture of compensatory and non-compensatory numeric variables. Therefore, to address this problem, a geometric aggregation was used. The case study constructed the five models of household welfare status of Dramaga village, Bogor regency that used the combination of weighting method based on multiple correspondence analysis and factor analysis of mixed data and linear and geometric aggregation. The five models are compared. The best model was model using the weighting method based on factor analysis of mixed data and the geometric aggregation for the numeric variables and the linear aggregation for the categoric variables.

References

  1. Castano, E. (2002). Proxy Means Test Index for Targeting Social Programs: Two Methodologies and Empirical Evidence. Lecturas de Economia, 56(1), 135-144
  2. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for Constructing Composite Indices: One for All or All for One?. Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, 67(2), 67-80
  3. Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S., & Boylaud, O. (2000). Summary Indicators Of Product Market Regulation With An Extension To Employment Protection Legislation. ECO/WKP. 226(1), 19-23
  4. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Developement OECD]. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators Methodology and User Guide, Paris: Author
  5. Pages, J. (2004). Analyse Factorielle de Donnees Mixtes. Revue de Statistiquee, 52(4), 93-111
  6. Sari, W.J. (2011). Pembentukan Indikator Sasaran Dengan Proxy Means Test Berdasarkan Metode Princals, Depok: Universitas Indonesia
  7. Tarabusi, E.C., & Guarini, G. (2013). An Unbalance Adjustment Method for Development Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 19-45
  8. Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan TNP2K]. (2013). Pembangunan Basis Data Terpadu untuk Mendukung Program Perlindungan Sosial, Jakarta: Author

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Arni Nurwida, Aji Hamim Wigena, Budi Susetyo, " Assessment Method for Weighting and Aggregation in Constructing Composite Indicators of Mixed Data, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp.1070-1083, March-April-2018.