Embedding Recycle as a Criterion to Enhance Sustainability

Authors(4) :-Aisha Mohammad Ali, Hadiza Bobbo, Magaji Salisu, Ibrahim Garba

The fast pace of transformation in the construction towards more sustainable construction strategy and process indirectly stimulates the training of students in institutions of higher learning. This phenomenon prevents a skill gap within the fresh graduates streaming into to professional practice. Therefore, sustainability features need to be integrated into the higher education curriculum for effective training and instruction to counter the perceived skill gap. The paper tend to proposed the process of embedding ‘recycle’ in federal polytechnic Bauchi environmental curriculum as a criterion to enhance sustainability. Through a literature review the research found out that the current curriculum has little or no elements of sustainability (Reduce Reuse and Recycle). A proposed inclusion of recycle which could be easily practice is necessary and would be the first of its kind in the polytechnic and if successfully embedded it will give room for other criterial to be included.

Authors and Affiliations

Aisha Mohammad Ali
Department of Estate Management, School of Environmental Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi Nigeria
Hadiza Bobbo
Department of Estate Management, School of Environmental Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi Nigeria
Magaji Salisu
Department of Estate Management, School of Environmental Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi Nigeria
Ibrahim Garba
Department of Estate Management, School of Environmental Technology, Federal Polytechnic Bauchi Nigeria

Embedding, Recycle, Criterion Sustainability

  1. Chapman, C. and Ward, S. (2007). Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques and Insights; 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Maldem, MA. 
  2. Rubel, Z. (2009). Design Administration in Virtual Construction – Optimizing for the ‘Big Room’ Experience. The American Institute of Architects, Knowledge Community, <http://www.aia.org/practicing/groups/kc/AIAB081949>.
  3. Liebing, R. (1999). The Construction Industry: Processes, Players, and Practices, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  4. Chelson, D. E. (2010). The Effects of Building Information Modeling on Construction Site Productivity. PhD Thesis, University of Maryland.
  5. Bashir, F. M., Ahmad, H. M., Ahmed, M. Y. & Dodo Y. A. (2012) A Preliminary Framework for Pedagogy of Sustainable Housing Policy in Nigerian Universities International policy brief series; Education & Science Journal of Policy Review & Curriculum Development Vol. 2, No. 1, Pp 66-72 2012 ISSN:2315-6635)
  6. Tsao, Cynthia C. Y.; Tommelein, Iris D.; Swanlund, Eric S.; and Howell, Gregory A. (2004). “Work Structuring to Achieve Integrated Product–Process Design.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 130(6), 780-789.
  7. Johnson, A. B., Charner, I. and White, R. (2003). Curriculum Integration in Context: An Exploration of How Structures and Circumstances Affect Design and Implementation. The National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, University of Minnesota.
  8. Lovat, T. J. (2003). The Role of the ‘Teacher’ coming of Age?” Australian Council Deans of Education, Discussion Paper.
  9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E. (Eds), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Bruner, J. (1982). The language of Education. Social Research, 49: 835-853.
  11. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? In R.A. Reiser & J. A. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 16-25). Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
  12. Silvern, L. C. (1965). Basic analysis. Los Angeles: Education and Training Consultants Company.
  13. Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: Braziller.
  14. Krygiel, E. and Nies, B. (2008). Green BIM: Successful Sustainable Design with Building Information Modeling, Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, IN. 
  15. Baker, K. (2009). Business Conditions at Architecture Firms Largely Unchanged in May. AIArchitect, 16. <http://info.aia.org/aiarchitect/thisweek09/0626/0626n_otb.cfm>.
  16. Lam, K. P. (2007). Enhancing Health, Productivity and Energy Management through BIM. Proc., Federal Environmental Symposium, Center for Building Performance & Diagnostics, Carnegie Mellon University.
  17. Sanvido, V. (2008). BIM Drives Lean Construction Management, Tradeline Lean Management Processes Conference.
  18. Fuller, S. (2008). Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Whole Building Design Guide, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), <http://www.wbdg.org/resources/lcca.php>.
  19. Jewett, A. E. and Mullan, M. R. (1977). Curriculum Design: Purposes and Processes in Physical Education reaching-Learning. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation (AAHPER), Washington, D.C.
  20. Macdonald, J. B., Wolfson, B. J. and Zaret, E. (1973). Reschooling Society: A Conceptual Model. Washington, DC: ASCD.
  21. Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its Development in Social Context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  22. Rogoff, B. and Gardner, W. (1984). Adult Guidance of Cognitive Development. In In Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (eds), Everyday cognition: Its Development in Social Context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 95-116.
  23. Zeuli, J. S. (1986). The use of the zone of proximal development in everyday and school contexts: A Vygotskian Critique. The Institute for Research on Teaching. Occasional Paper no. 100.
  24. Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (eds), Everyday cognition: Its Development in Social Contaxt. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press: 117-138.
  25. Banathy, B. H. (1987). Instructional systems design. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 85-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  26. Reiser, R.A. (2012). History of instructional design and technology. In R.A. Reiser & J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  27. Enegbuma, W. I. and Ali, K. N. (2011). A Preliminary Study on Building Information Modeling (BIM) Implementation in Malaysia. Proceedings of 3rd International Postgraduate Conference on Infrastructure and Environment (IPCIE2011). Hong Kong.
  28. Hung, W. (2009). The 9-step problem design process for problem-based learning: Application of the 3C3R model. Educational Research Review 4, 118–141.
  29. Barrows, H. S. and Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning. New York: Springer.
  30. Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11–16.
  31. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
  32. Torp, L. and Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  33. Hoffman, B. and Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science, 25(2), 97–115.
  34. Nilashi, M., Zakaria, R Ibrahim, O., Abd. Majide, M. Z., Zin, M. R., Chugtai, M. W., Zainal-Abidin, N. I., Sahamir, S. R. Dodo Y. A. (2015) A knowledge-based expert system for assessing the performance level of green buildings Knowledge-Based Systems Available online 14 June 2015 doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.009  IF 3.058
  35. Jibril, D. J., Ibrahim, S., Dodo, Y. A. Zulkepli, M., & Jogana, M.A. (2013) Awareness of 3R's Critical Success Factor for a Greener Higher Educational Institutions Advanced Materials Research Vol. 689 (2013) Pp. 561-564 Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland DOI: 10.4028/www.sciencetific.net/AMR.689.561
  36. Dodo, Y. A., Ossen, D. R., Enegbuma, W.I & Jibril, D. J. (2011) Adopting The Principles of The Four R’s of Sustainability To Restore Our Depleted Environment 5th International Conference On Built Environment In Developing Countries (ICBEDC 2011) 6th – 7th December 2011, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.
  37. 1Faizah Mohammed Bashir, 2Safiya Othman and 3Aliyu Abubakar (2015) Revolutionizing the Pedagogy of Architecture to Accommodate Current Scenario of Sustainable Design Advances in Architecture, City and Environment 1(3) Pp1-6 ISSN-2077-4370 http://www.iwnest.com/AACE

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 1 | Issue 6 | November-December 2015
Date of Publication : 2015-12-25
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 270-274
Manuscript Number : IJSRSET151630
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099

Cite This Article :

Aisha Mohammad Ali, Hadiza Bobbo, Magaji Salisu, Ibrahim Garba, " Embedding Recycle as a Criterion to Enhance Sustainability, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 1, Issue 6, pp.270-274, November-December-2015.
Journal URL : http://ijsrset.com/IJSRSET151630

Article Preview