IJSRSET calls volunteers interested to contribute towards the scientific development in the field of Science, Engineering and Technology

Home > IJSRSET1622284                                                     

BTS Identification Technique


Shruthi.C.G, Dasharath, Kiran Abhishek, Madhumala.K.M, R.Gunasekari
  • Abstract
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Details
Brain tumor segmentation consists of separating the different tumor tissues (solid or active tumor, edema, and necrosis) from normal brain tissues: gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF). In brain tumor studies, the existence of abnormal tissues may be easily detectable most of the time. In the past, many researchers in the field of medical imaging and soft computing have made significant survey in the field of brain tumor segmentation. Both semiautomatic and fully automatic methods have been proposed. Interactive or semiautomatic methods are likely to remain dominant in practice for some time, especially in these applications where erroneous interpretations are unacceptable. This article presents an overview of the most relevant brain tumor segmentation methods, conducted after the acquisition of the image. Given the advantages of magnetic resonance imaging over other diagnostic imaging, this survey is focused on MRI brain tumor segmentation. Semiautomatic and fully automatic techniques are emphasized.

Shruthi.C.G, Dasharath, Kiran Abhishek, Madhumala.K.M, R.Gunasekari

Brain Tumor, Tumor Tissues, White Matter, Gray Matter, Cerebrospinal ?uid, MRI

  1. Yao J. Image processing in tumor imaging. New techniques in oncologic imaging; 2006. p. 79–102.
  2. Foo JL. A survey of user interaction and automation in medical image segmentation methods. Tech rep ISUHCI20062, Human Computer Interaction Department, Iowa State Univ; 2006.
  3. Olabarriaga S, Smeulders A. Interaction in the segmentation of medical images:a survey. Med Image Anal 2001;5:127–42.
  4. Prastawa M, Bullitt E, Moon N, Van Leemput K, Gerig G. Automatic brain tumor segmentation by subject specific modification of atlas priors. Acad Radiol 2003;10(12):1341–8.
  5. Mazzara G, Velthuizen R, Pearlman J, Greenberg H, Wagner H. Brain tumor target determination for radiation treatment planning through automated MRI segmentation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59(1):300–12.
  6. Ho S, Bullitt E, Gerig G. Level set evolution with region competition: automatic 3-D segmentation of brain tumors. Int Conf Pattern Rec 2002;I:532–5.
  7. Dou W, Ruan S, Chen Y, Bloyet D, Constans JM. A framework of fuzzy information fusion for the segmentation of brain tumor tissues on MR images. Image Vis Comput 2007;25:164–71.
  8. Khotanlou H, Colliot O, Atif J, Bloch I. 3D brain tumor segmentation in MRI using fuzzy classification, symmetry analysis and spatially constrained deformable models. Fuzzy Set Syst 2009;160(10):1457–73.
  9. Schmidt M. Automatic brain tumor segmentation. Master’s thesis, University of Alberta, 2005.
  10. Kong J, Wang J, Lu Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Zhang B. A novel approach for segmentation of MRI brain images. IEEE MELECON; 2006. p. 525–8.
  11. Supot S, Thanapong C, Chuchart P, Manas S. Segmentation of magnetic resonance images using discrete curve evolution and fuzzy clustering. IEEE Int Conf Integration Tech; 2007. p. 697–700.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 2 | Issue 2 | March-April - 2016
Date of Publication Print ISSN Online ISSN
2016-04-30 2395-1990 2394-4099
Page(s) Manuscript Number   Publisher
930-933 IJSRSET1622284   Technoscience Academy

Cite This Article

Shruthi.C.G, Dasharath, Kiran Abhishek, Madhumala.K.M, R.Gunasekari, "BTS Identification Technique", International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp.930-933, March-April-2016.
URL : http://ijsrset.com/IJSRSET1622284.php




National Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering 2017(NCAME 2017)

National Conference on Emerging Trends in Civil Engineering 2017( NCETCE 2017)