A Research on Comparison of PT beam and RCC beam for cost and deflection

Authors

  • Vaibhav G Tejani  Civil Engineering Department, CGPIT, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, India
  • Hitesh K Dhameliya  Civil Engineering Department, CGPIT, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, India
  • Jasmin Gadhiya  Civil Engineering Department, CGPIT, Uka Tarsadia University, Bardoli, India

Keywords:

Prestressing Systems Pre-Tensioning Systems Post-Tensioning Systems, ADAPT-PT/RC 2015, STAAD.PRO v8i SS5

Abstract

PT not only give the problems beautiful solution, but he also showed us how to build it., Now a days, as architectural demand,structure become more slender and have a very long span ,by RCC we cannot fulfill architecture requirement,in some case RCC also fulfill architecture requirement for a certain span length but after span RCC structure become costly, so it's a research work which structure is economical for post tensioning,for a span, also high labour cost countries is to avoid external scaffolding, for low-rise structures to precast as far as practical and to prestress concrete, not only horizontally, but also vertically so as to resist lateral loads. In most structures today, the increasing use of prestressing has given new freedom to any concept of forms previously considered uneconomic or unfeasible or unduly bulky to resist loads. This research paper is focused on beam design for long span which is used at cinema, multipurpose hole, shopping mole. Pt beam is analysis and design by ADAPT-PT/RC 2015. RCC beam is analysis by STAAD.PRO v8i SS5 and design by manually. Here take beam with two span both span equal length, span of beam 5m to 20m at 3 m interval.

References

  1. Rajamoori Arun Kumar1, B. Vamsi Krishna2 “Design of Pre-Stressed Concrete T-Beams” in 2014 International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER) Volume 2 Issue 8, August 2014, ISSN (Online): 2347-3878.
  2. Vakas K. Rahman1, Prof. A. R. Mundhada2, “Comparative Study of RCC and Prestressed Concrete FlatSlabs” in International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) Vol. 3, Issue. 3, May.-June. 2013 pp-1727-1730 ISSN: 2249-6645
  3. Ankit Sahu, Prof. Anubhav Rai, Prof. Y.K. Bajpai. , “Cost Comparison Between RCC & Post-Tensioned Prestressed Beams Spanning 26m.” International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER) PP ISSN (e): 2250 – 3005 || Vol, 04 || Issue, 6 || June – 2014
  4. A.R.Mundhada, Mohammad Shahezad  “Economics of Continuous R.C.C. Beams Vis-à-vis Continuous Pre-stressed Concrete Beams” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 3, Issue 7, July-2012 1 ISSN 2229-5518 IJSER
  5. Pradeep Nath Mathur *, Prof.(Dr.) A. K. Sinha“system develop of mechanism, anchoring device in pre and post tensioned concrete structural elements” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 2, February 2015 1 ISSN 2250-3153
    IS: 1343 – 2012 Code of Practice for Pre-stressed Concrete.
    IS: 456 - 2000 Code of Practice for Structural Concrete

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Vaibhav G Tejani, Hitesh K Dhameliya, Jasmin Gadhiya, " A Research on Comparison of PT beam and RCC beam for cost and deflection, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp.1217-1220, March-April-2016.