Hydraulic Evaluation of River Restoration Using Numerical Modelling Approach

Authors

  • Hossam El Sersawy  Associate Professor, Nile Research Institute (NRI), National Water Research Center (NWRC), EL-Qanater, P.O. Box 13621, Egypt
  • Zeinab El Barbary  Associate Professor, Nile Research Institute (NRI), National Water Research Center (NWRC), EL-Qanater, P.O. Box 13621, Egypt

Keywords:

Dredging, Human Interventions, Hydraulic Modeling, River Restoration

Abstract

It is well recognized that urbanization strongly impacts on the Nile River characteristics. The Nile River has experienced major morphological changes during the past decades. Unplanned human interventions and their activities change the connections between the river channel and its adjacent floodplain as shown at Al Wasta City waterfront which located on the west bank of the Nile River, about 81.50 kilometers south of Cairo, Egypt. The study reach suffered from decreased morphological and ecological diversities resulting from human interventions. The major thrust of this research is the proposition of a new strategic plan for river restoration based on quantitative analysis rather than only qualitative assessment. The main goals of the research are to analyze the historic and present river geomorphic and morphologic characterizations at the study area, develop the hydraulic modeling approach to detect these changes using two dimensional model, and propose and evaluate four restoration alternatives to increase hydraulic efficiency of the river channel. The number of restoration alternatives were identified and were evaluated to find favorable restoration measures to improve the hydrodynamic conditions at the study reach in order to be able to control and sustain the desired water levels, water flow velocity, and hydraulic channel conditions by the removal of sediment deposition (by the dredging process). The two dimensional hydrodynamic model was used to map the flow pattern in the study area and to identify the areas of accelerated sediment deposition. The model results indicated the slight improvement in the values and distribution of water velocities at the western bank of the study reach and secondary channel (khor channel). The third proposal represented the best proposals in terms of the relative efficiency of hydraulic properties. The proposal include the elimination of constraints to river’s natural patterns, and drive river channel to return to the track of natural succession, and keeping a state of hydraulically and morphological balance.

References

  1. Attia, K., and El Sersawy, H. (2004), “Realignment of West Side of the River Nile Downstream New Esna Barrages Using Mathematical Models”, NRI Technical Report in Arabic.
  2. Brookes, A. (1988), Channelized Rivers: Perspectives for Environmental Management. Wiley, Chichester, 326 pp.
  3. Brookes, A. (1995) a. River channel restoration: Theory and practice. In: Gurnell, A. and Petts, G. (Eds.), Changing River Channels. Wiley, Chichester, 369-388.
  4. Brookes, A. (1996). Floodplain restoration and rehabilitation. In: Anderson, M. A., Walling, D. E. and Bates, P. D. (Eds.), Floodplain Processes. Wiley, Chichester, 553-576.
  5. Cairns, J., Jr. (1991). The status of the theoretical and applied science of restoration ecology. The Environmental Professional, 13, 186-194.
  6. Chang, H.H. and Hill, J.C. (1976). “Computer Modeling of Erodible Flood Channels and Deltas”, J. Hydraul. Div., ASCE, 102 (HY10), pp.1461-1477, October 1976.
  7. Chang, H.H. (1988). “Fluvial Processes in River Engineering”, Abook published by Wiley Interstice Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 0-471-63139-6.
  8. Holmes, N. T. H. (1998). The River Restoration Project and its demonstration sites. In: de Waal, L. C., Large, A. R. G. and Wade, P. M. (Eds.), Rehabilitation of Rivers: Principles and Implementation. Wiley, Chichester, 133-148.
  9. Finite Element Surface Modeling System (FESWMS) (1991), Two Dimensional Flow in a Horizontal Plane. User’s Manual, Highway Research Center, Pike, McLean, Virginia.
  10. Nile Research Institute (2013), "Development of Waterfront of Al Wasta, Beni Suef, Egypt". Technical Report.
  11. Nile Research Institute, (2003). "Hydrographic and Topographic Maps of the River Nile".
  12. Poff L. N., Allan D., Bain M. B., et al.(1997). The natural flow regime, a paradigm for river conservation and restoration [J]. Bioscience, 47,769–784.
  13. Richards KS. 1982 Rivers: Form and Process in Alluvial Channels. Methuen: London.
  14. Sear, D. and Newson, M. (1994). Sediment and gravel transportation in rivers: A geomorphological approach to river maintenance, policy and implementation recommendations. R&D Note 315, National Rivers Authority, Bristol, 28 pp.
  15. Schumm SA. 1973. Geomorphic thresholds and complex response of drainage systems. In Fluvial Geomorphology, Morisawa (ed.). Publications in Geomorphology: SUNY Binghamton; 299–309.
  16. Wael M. Ziada, (2009). "Effect of Man Made Interventions on River Nile Hydraulic Characteristics." Master's Degree Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Shobra, Banha University.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Hossam El Sersawy, Zeinab El Barbary, " Hydraulic Evaluation of River Restoration Using Numerical Modelling Approach, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 2, Issue 6, pp.607-617, November-December-2016.