Cow Dung to Kilo Watt using Double Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell

Authors

  • Kamau J.M  Department of Chemistry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Mbui D.N  School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Mwaniki J.M  School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Mwaura F.B  School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

Keywords:

Microbial Fuel Cells, Voltage, Current, Power Density

Abstract

In the current study, voltage is generated from cow waste at varying time duration of 6 to 11 days. PVC pipe was used to make a salt bridge using agarose and potassium chloride and Sodium chloride. The performance of microbial fuel cells was evaluated by characterizing the generated voltage, current, power and surface power density. It was observed that despite the high impedance of the substrate, all the generated parameters have shown maximum values at day 6 and then a decline in trend was observed on 7 days onwards. The highest values of voltage, current, power, current density and power density obtained were 0.5090V, 0.28?A, 0.0093?W, 0.05181mA/m2 and 0.0000006 W/m2 respectively. The study concluded that microbial fuel cells technology can be used to generate electricity from cow dung.

References

  1. Parkash A (2016) Characterization of Generated Voltage, Current, Power and Power Density from Cow Dung Using Double Chambered Microbial Fuel Cell. J Phys Chem Biophys 6: 208. doi:10.4172/2161-0398.1000208
  2. GTZ (2007): Eastern Africa Resource Base: GTZ Online Regional Energy Resource Base: Regional and Country Specific Energy Resource Database: IV - Energy Policy: 1-36.
  3. PAC (2010), Practical Action Consulting Bioenergy and Poverty in Kenya: Attitudes, Actors and Activities. PISCES Working Paper, Nairobi, Kenya.
  4. Ministry of Energy, Kenya (2016): Last mile connectivity projects report.
  5. Henrian, H et al., harvesting electrical energy from cellulose using cow manure microorganisms as biocatalysts in a two-chamber, 4th national science and mathematics Congress of regional science high schools, 2008
  6. H. Liu, B.E. Logan, Electricity generation using an air–cathode single chamber MFCin the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2004, pp. 4040–4046
  7. Yokoyama.H et al, treatment of cow-waste slurry by a MFC and the properties of the treated slurry as a liquid manure, animal science journal, Animal Science journal, 2006, volume 77, issue 6, pp. 634– 638,
  8. X. Zheng et al, cattle wastes as substrates for bioelectricity production via microbial fuel cells, biotechnology letters, 2010, volume 32, issue 12, pp 1809-1814
  9. Khare. A et al., Generation of electricity using vermicompost with different substrates through single chamber MFC approach, the international journal of engineering trends and technology, 2013, vol 4. lee.Y et al., electricity production in membrane-less MFC fed with livestock organic solid waste,
  10. Bioresource technology, volume 102, issue 10, May 2011, pages 5831–5835.
  11. Zhang.G et al, Biocathode Microbial Fuel Cell for Efficient ElectricityRecovery from Dairy Manure, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2011.
  12. Arup Pal, Bishwajit Nayak, Bhaskar Das, M. Amir Hossain, Sad Ahamed and Dipankar Chakraborti* “Additional danger of arsenic exposure through inhalation from burning of cow dung cakes laced with arsenic as a fuel in arsenic affected villages in Ganga–Meghna–Brahmaputra plain” J. Environ. Monit., 2007, 9, 1067–1070.
  13. Priyabrata Thatoi (2011); Characterization of generated Voltage, Current, Power and Power Density from Cow Dung using Double Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell
  14. Cheng, S., Liu, H., and Logan, B.E. (2006) Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with adjective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environ Sci Technol 40: 2426–2432.
  15. Min, B., Kim, J.R., Oh, S.E., Regan, J.M., and Logan, B.E. (2005) Electricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells. Water Res 39: 4961–4968.
  16. Morris, J.M., and Jin, S. (2008) Feasibility of using microbial fuel cell technology for bioremediation of hydrocarbons in groundwater. J Environ Sci Health A 43: 18–23.
  17. Park, D.H., and Zeikus, J.G. (2003) Improved fuel cell and electrode designs for producing electricity from microbial degradation. Biotechnol Bioeng 81: 348–355.
  18. Rabaey, K., Boon, N., Hofte, M., and Verstraete, W. (2005) Microbial phenazine production enhances electron transfer in biofuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 39: 3401–3408.
  19. Morris, J.M., and Jin, S. (2008) Feasibility of using microbial fuel cell technology for bioremediation of hydrocarbons in groundwater. J Environ Sci Health A 43: 18–23.
  20. Eric A. Zielke (2005) Design of a single chamber Microbial Fuel Cell
  21. Priyabrata Thatoi (2011); Characterization of generated Voltage, Current, Power and Power Density from Cow Dung using Double Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell
  22. Sandeep. S 2015, Microbial Fuel Cell for Electricity Production, International Journal of Bio-Technology and Research (IJBTR) Vol 5, Pp 23- 30
  23. Parkash Anand (2016) Characterization of generated Voltage, Current, Power and Power Density from Cow Dung using Double Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell. J Phys Chem Biophys 6: 208. Doi: 10.4172/2161-0398.1000208.
  24. Shiv Kumar, Harsh Dev, Gireesh Babu K (2012). A study on the electricity generation from the cow dung using microbial fuel cell. J Biochem Tech. Vol 3(4); 442-447
  25. Liu et al (2005) production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 39: 658-662

Downloads

Published

2017-08-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Kamau J.M, Mbui D.N, Mwaniki J.M, Mwaura F.B, " Cow Dung to Kilo Watt using Double Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp.70-79, July-August-2017.