Dose Assessment of the Rectum during Brachytherapy of the Cervix Using Gafchromic Films

Authors

  • J. Avevor  University of Cape Coast, School of Agriculture and Physical Sciences Faculty of Physical Sciences, Department of Physics, Cape coast, Ghana
  • S. N. A Tagoe  National Centre of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Physics, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra Ghana
  • J. H. Amuasi  Graduate School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
  • J. J. Fletcher  Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Accra, Ghana
  • I. Shirazu  University of Cape Coast, School of Agriculture and Physical Sciences Faculty of Physical Sciences, Department of Physics, Cape coast, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRSET173487

Keywords:

Brachy Prowess, Rectum, Intracavitary, Optimised Dose, Gafchromic

Abstract

Internal radiation therapy, refers to as brachytherapy, involve putting a source of radiation with high photon in or near a cancerous tissues. The type of brachytherapy used most often to treat cervical cancer is known as intracavitary brachytherapy. Unfortunately however, the radiation source placed in the cervix irradiate the normal tissues of rectum and other nearby organs during intracavitary brachytherapy of the cervix treatment. This high doses received by parts of the rectum is a concern for clinicians and the general public. The aim of this study is to assess the dose delivered to the rectum using Gafchromic films and compare it with the optimized dose calculated by the Brachy Prowess 4.60 Treatment Planning System (TPS) reports for empirical validation and system verification. Fletcher suite applicators were used to perform thirty (30) different clinical insertions on the constructed cervix phantom and results evaluated. The mean difference between the doses calculated by the TPS and the doses measured by the Gafchromic film for the rectum at the distance of 0.5cm from the edges of the film was 23.1% (range -42.42 to +40.41). At a distance of 1.5cm for the rectum the mean was 22.5% (range -49.45 to +46.48). The TPS calculated maximum dose was typically higher than the measured maximum dose. However, in some cases, the measured doses were found to be higher than the doses calculated by the TPS. This is due to positional inaccuracies of the sources during treatment planning. It is recommended that in vivo dosimetry should be performed in addition to computation.

References

  1. AAPM Report (1997) Code of practice for brachytherapy physics. Radiation Therapy committee Task Group No. 56
  2. AAPM Report No. 63(1998), Radiochromic Film Dosimetry Recommendations of AAPM. Radiation Therapy Committee. Task Group No. 55:6-9.
  3. Abdel-Rahman W., SeuntjensJ. P., Verhaegen F., DebloisF. and Podgorsak E. B.,(1995) Validation of Monte Carlo calculated surface doses for megavoltage photon beams, Med. Phys. 32: 286-298
  4. Attix, F.H. (1998) Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry, Wiley, New York.
  5. Bentel, G.C., (1996) Radiation Therapy Planning, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  6. Bentel, G.C., Nelson, Neoll C.E, K.T.,(1998)Treatment Planning and Dose Calculation in Radiation Oncology, Pergamon Press, New York
  7. Bevelacqua, Joseph J. John Wiley & Sons (1995) Contemporary Health Physics, Inc. New York.
  8. Butson M. J. Yu K.N.P. and Metcalfe P. E(1999)., Extrapolated surface dose measurements with radiochromic film, Med. Phys. 26, page 485-488
  9. Butson M. J., Mathur J.N., and Metcalfe P.E., (1996) Radiochromic film as a radiotherapy surface-dose detector, Phys. Med. Biol. 41, pages 1073-1078.
  10. Butson M. J., Yu K. N., Cheung T., and Metcalfe P. E., Radiochromic film for Medical Radiation Dosimetry, Mater. Sci. Eng., R. 41, 61-120 2003.
  11. Butson M. J., Yu P. K. N and Metcalfe P.E.,(1996) Measurement of off-axis dose and peripheral skin dose using radiochromic film, Phys. Med. Biol. 43, pages 2647-2650
  12. Cheung T., Butson M. J, Yu P. K. N, (2002) Multilayer Gafchromic film detectors for breast skin dose determination in vivo, Phys. Med. Biol. 47, N31-N37.
  13. Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM .Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56
  14. Devic S., Seuntjens J., Sham E., Podgorsak E. B,. KirovA. S,. Schmidtlein R. C, and SoaresC. G.,(2005)Precise radiochromic film dosimetry using a flat-bed document scanner, Med. Phys. 32, page 2245-2253.
  15. Devic S., Seuntjens J., Hegyi G, Podgorsak E.B,. SoaresC. G,. KirovA. S, Ali I., J. Williamson J.F, and  Elizondo A.,(2004) Dosimetric properties of improved Gafchromic films for seven different digitizers," Med. Phys. 31,page 2392-2401 .
  16. Faiz Khan M. and Roger Potish A.(1998) Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology page 258-259
  17. Hine, G. J. and Brownell, G. L., (Ed. ),(1956) Radiation Dosimetry, Academic Press New York
  18. IAEA, 1997. Determination of Absorbed Dose in Photon and Electron Beams, 2ndEdition, Technical Reports Series No. 277,  Vienna
  19. IAEA, 2005. Radiation Oncology Physics: A handbook for Teachers and Students, Vienna, Pages: 45-60, 81,164.
  20. IAEA. (9-12 Nov 2010), Standards, Applications and Quality Assurance in Medical Radiation Dosimetry (IDOS).Proceedings of an International symposium, Vol 2. Vienna
  21. ICRP. (1973) Data for Protection against Ionizing Radiation from External Sources: Supplement to ICRP Publication 15. A Report of ICRP Committee 3, ICRP Publication 21, Pergamon Press. Oxford.
  22. ICRU, 1998. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Fundamental Quantities and Units for Ionizing Radiation, Report No. 60, Bethesda.
  23. ICRU.(1993),Quantities and Units in Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Report No. 51, Bethesda
  24. Jacek G. Wierzbicki and Richard Meyer (1991) Routine verification of the strength of Cs-137 brachytherapy source. Department of Radiation medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Centre, 800 Rose street Lexington, Kentucky. Medical Physics, Vol 20, No.1.
  25. Kawrakow I and Rogers D. W. O.(2000)  The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport, Technical Report PIRS 701, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
  26. Kent A. Glifford, John L. Horton Jr. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology. Physics-Vol 63. 2005;615-616
  27. Knoll, G.T.,(2000) Radiation Detection and Measurement, 3rd Edition, Wiley, New York

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Downloads

Published

2017-08-30

Issue

Volume 3, Issue 5, July-August-2017

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRSET

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
J. Avevor, S. N. A Tagoe, J. H. Amuasi, J. J. Fletcher, I. Shirazu, " Dose Assessment of the Rectum during Brachytherapy of the Cervix Using Gafchromic Films, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp.651-659, July-August-2017. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET173487