The Role of CLT in EFL Classroom

Authors(2) :-Hisham Ahmed Said Al Balushi, Behnam Behforouz

The present paper tries to give a qualitative report on communicative language teaching`s advantages and disadvantages. Meanwhile, it investigates some studies in various countries on CLT and examines its theoreticians` ideas.

Authors and Affiliations

Hisham Ahmed Said Al Balushi
English Language Department, Sohar College of Applied Sciences, Oman
Behnam Behforouz
English Language Department, Sohar College of Applied Sciences, Oman

CLT, Advantages, Disadvantages

  1. Al-Humaidi, M. (2007).Communicative Language Teaching. King Saud University. Retrieved March 4, 2009, from
  2. Al-Issa, A. S. (2006). The cultural and economic politics of English language teaching in Sultanate of Oman. Asian EFL Journal 8 (1): 9.
  3. Al-jadidi, Husna Suleiman S. (2009) Teaching English as a foreign language in Oman: an exploration of English Language teaching pedagogy in tertiary education. PhD thesis. Victoria University.
  4. Anderson, J. (1993). Is a communicative approach practical for teaching English in China? Pros and cons. System 21: 471-480.
  5. Bao, J., & Sun, J. (2010).English grammatical problems of Chinese undergraduate students. English Language Teaching, 3 (2), 48,50.
  6. Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57(3), 278-287.
  7. Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980).The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-110.
  8. Brown, D., H (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman Inc.
  9. Canale,M.,& Swain, M.(1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1): 1-47.
  10. Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38.4, 639-662.
  11. Chen, T. (2003). Reticence in class and online: two ESL students' experiences with Communicative Language Teaching. System Journal, 31 (1), 263-269.
  12. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Ellis, G. (1996). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT Journal, 50 (3): 213-18.
  14. Finoocchiaro, M.,& Brumfit, C. (1983).The functional-notional approach. New York Oxford University press.
  15. Hinkel, E. (2006). Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 109-131.
  16. Holiday, A. 1994.The house of TESP and the communicative approach. English Language Teaching Journal 48 (1): 3-11.
  17. Hiep, P.H. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal, 61(3), 193-201.
  18. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
  19. Kharma , N.,&Hajjaj , A. (1997). Errors among Arabic speakers: Analaysis and remedy. Beirut: Libraire du Liban.
  20. Kramsch, C., & P. Sullivan.(1996). Appropriate pedagogy. ELT Journal, 50(3), 199-212.
  21. Kong, N. (2011). Establishing a comprehensive English teaching pattern combining the communicative teaching method and the grammar-translation method. English Language Teaching, 4 (1),77.
  22. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post method. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  23. Lee, S.M. (2005). The pros and cons of task-based instruction in elementary English classes. English Teaching,60.2, 185-205.
  24. Li, D. F. (1998).It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677-703.
  25. Littlewood, W. (2007).Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243-249.
  26. Mitchell, R. (1994). The communicative approach to language teaching. In A. Swarbrick, A. (ed).Teaching modern languages. London: Rouledge, pp. 33-42.
  27. Nazari, A. (2007).EFL teachers' perception of the concept of communicative competence. ELT Journal, 61(3), 202-210.
  28. Nunan, D., & Walton.(1987). Philosophy and Guidelines for the Omani English language school curriculum: Ministry of education and youth. Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
  29. Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  30. Nunan, D.(2001). The Second language curriculum in the new millennium. World News. Retrived May 15, 2011, from
  31. Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4): 589-618.
  32. Zekariya, O.(2010).The use of communicative language teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL teachers’ perceived difficulties in implementing CLT in Turkey. University of Illinois-Champagne.
  33. Richards, J. C., & Rogers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Rogers, T. (2001).Language teaching methodology, online resource. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from
  35. Samimy, K. K., & Kobayashi, C. (2004). Toward the development of intercultural communicative competence: Theoretical and pedagogical implications for Japanese English teachers. JALT Journal, 26(2), 245-261.
  36. Savignon, S. J., & Wang, C. (2003).Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. IRAL 41 (3),  223-49.
  37. Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: current status and future prospects. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of teaching English (pp. 271-288). New York: Springer.
  38. Tarone, E. (2005). Speaking in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 485-502). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  39. Thornbury, S. (1998).Teachers of English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly,32 (1): 109-115.
  40. Wang, R. (1990). Focusing on oral communicative competence. English Teaching Forum, 28: 36-38.
  41. Xu, Y. (2010). Theories analysing communicative approach in China’s EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 3 (1),161.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 6 | September-October 2017
Date of Publication : 2017-10-31
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 935-940
Manuscript Number : IJSRSET17382
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099

Cite This Article :

Hisham Ahmed Said Al Balushi, Behnam Behforouz, " The Role of CLT in EFL Classroom, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp.935-940, September-October-2017.
Journal URL :

Article Preview