IJSRSET calls volunteers interested to contribute towards the scientific development in the field of Science, Engineering and Technology

Home > IJSRSET173825                                                     


Life Cycle Analysis in Manufacturing Industry - A Case Study

Authors(3):

Rao Pratik, Pradeep Kumar, Dr. Kailash Chaudhary
  • Abstract
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Details
The method used in this project is LCA and the study is performed from gate (beginning of the company) to gate (end of the Company). LCA is a method to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with a specific product or service. All stages in the life cycle are taken into account and use of natural resources, transportation, energy consumption, waste and emissions are considered. LCA can be used for identification of improvement possibilities, decision-making etc. but has also an important application in learning about environmental impacts caused by substances and processes used in the life cycle. This is mainly what is done in this study.

Rao Pratik, Pradeep Kumar, Dr. Kailash Chaudhary

Environmental Impacts, NBC, ISO, LCIA, LCA, GWP, LCI

  1. International Standard ISO 14040. Environmental management life cycle assessment principles and framework; 1997.
  2. Day, George S. "The product life cycle: analysis and applications issues." The Journal of Marketing (1981): 60-67.
  3. Ayres, Robert U. "Life cycle analysis: A critique." Resources, conservation and recycling 14.3 (1995): 199-223.
  4. ISO 14042. Environmental management life cycle assessment,life cycle impact assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organisation (ISO); 2000.
  5. Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G, Lindeijer E, Jolliet O, Rydberg T, et al. Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice Environ Int. 2004. [submitted for publication] doi: 10.1016/j.envint. 2003.12.009.
  6. Bauman, Henrikke, and Anne-Marie Tillman. "The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA."Studentlitteratur AB, Sweden (2004).
  7. Reap, John, et al. "A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment-Part I goals and scope and inventory analysis." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13.4 (2008): 290-300.
  8. Weidema, Bo, et al. "The product, functional unit and reference flow in LCA."Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental News 70 (2004).
  9. Matheys, Julien, et al. "Influence of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of traction batteries." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12.3 (2007): 191-196.
  10. Löfgren, Birger, Anne-Marie Tillman, and Björn Rinde. "Manufacturing actor’s LCA." Journal of Cleaner Production. 19.17 (2011): 2025-2033.
  11. Tillman, Anne-Marie, et al. "Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment." Journal of Cleaner Production 2.1 (1994): 21-29.
  12. Ekvall, Tomas, and Bo P. Weidema. "System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9.3 (2004): 161-171.
  13. Ny, Henrik, et al. "Sustainability constraints as system boundaries: an approach to making life?cycle management strategic." Journal of Industrial Ecology 10.1?2 (2006): 61-77.
  14. Lundin, Margareta, Magnus Bengtsson, and Sverker Molander. "Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems: influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads." Environmental Science & Technology 34.1 (2000): 180-186.
  15. Tillman, Anne-Marie, et al. "Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment." Journal of Cleaner Production 2.1 (1994): 21-29.
  16. Weidema, Bo Pedersen. Geographical, Technological and Temporal Delimitations in LCA. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2005.
  17. Levasseur, Annie, et al. "Considering time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments." Environmental science & technology 44.8 (2010): 3169-3174.
  18. Levasseur, Annie, et al. "Considering time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments." Environmental science & technology 44.8 (2010): 3169-3174.
  19. Suh, Sangwon, et al. "System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches." Environmental Science & Technology 38.3 (2004): 657-664.
  20. Vogtländer, Joost Geert. A Practical Guide to LCA for Students, Designers and Business Managers: Cradle-to-grave and Cradle-to-cradle. VSSD, 2010.
  21. Werner, Frank, and Klaus Richter. "Economic allocation in LCA: A case study about aluminium window frames." The international journal of life cycle assessment 5.2 (2000): 79-83.
  22. Luo, Lin, et al. "Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment14.6 (2009): 529-539.
  23. Rebitzer, Gerald, et al. "Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications." Environment international 30.5 (2004): 701-720.
  24. Reap, John, et al. "A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment-Part I goals and scope and inventory analysis." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13.4 (2008): 290-300.
  25. Guinée, Jeroen B. "Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards." The international journal of life cycle assessment 7.5 (2002): 311-313.
  26. de Haes, Helias A. Udo, et al. "Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4.2 (1999): 66-74.
  27. Hauschild, Michael Zwicky, et al. "Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice." (2002).
  28. Koellner, Thomas, and Roland W. Scholz. "Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment-Part 2: Generic characterization factors for local species diversity in Central Europe." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13.1 (2008): 32-48.
  29. Lundie, Sven, et al. "Australian characterisation factors and normalisation figures for human toxicity and ecotoxicity." Journal of Cleaner Production 15.8 (2007): 819-832.
  30. Björklund, Anna, and Göran Finnveden. "Recycling revisited—life cycle comparisons of global warming impact and total energy use of waste management strategies." Resources, Conservation and Recycling 44.4 (2005): 309-317.
  31. Breedveld, Leo, Marije Lafleur, and Hans Blonk. "A framework for actualising normalisation data in LCA: Experiences in the Netherlands." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4.4 (1999): 213-220.
  32. Sleeswijk, Anneke Wegener, et al. "Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: An LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000." Science of the total environment 390.1 (2008): 227-240.
  33. Sun, M., C. J. Rydh, and H. Kaebernick. "Material grouping for simplified product life cycle assessment." The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 3.1-2 (2003): 45-58.
  34. De Benedetto, Luca, and Ji?í Klemeš. "The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process." Journal of Cleaner Production 17.10 (2009): 900-906.
  35. Weiss, Martin, et al. "Applying distance-to-target weighing methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials." Resources, Conservation and Recycling 50.3 (2007): 260-281.
  36. Bengtsson, Magnus, and Bengt Steen. "Weighting in LCA–approaches and applications." Environmental progress 19.2 (2000): 101-109.
  37. Finnveden, Göran. "Valuation methods within LCA-Where are the values?." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2.3 (1997): 163-169.
  38. Hertwich, Edgar G., and James K. Hammitt. "A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6.5 (2001): 265-272.
  39. Finnveden, Goran, et al. "Normalization, grouping and weighting in life cycle impact assessment." Lifecycle impacts assessment striving towards best practice. SETAC. Pensacola Fl. USA (2002).
  40. Hellweg, Stefanie, Thomas B. Hofstetter, and Konrad Hungerbuhler. "Discounting and the environment should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations?." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8.1 (2003): 8-18.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 8 | November-December - 2017
Date of Publication Print ISSN Online ISSN
2017-12-31 2395-1990 2394-4099
Page(s) Manuscript Number   Publisher
74-81 IJSRSET173825   Technoscience Academy

Cite This Article

Rao Pratik, Pradeep Kumar, Dr. Kailash Chaudhary , "Life Cycle Analysis in Manufacturing Industry - A Case Study", International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 8, pp.74-81, November-December-2017.
URL : http://ijsrset.com/IJSRSET173825.php