Model Averaging Approach in Calibration Model

Authors

  • Deiby Tineke Salaki  Department of Mathematics, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Anang Kurnia  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Arief Gusnanto  Department of Statistics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
  • I Wayan Mangku  Department of Mathematics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Bagus Sartono  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

Keywords:

AIC, Calibration model, Curcumoid, FTIR, High-dimensional data, Jackknife ,Mallows Cp, Model averaging.

Abstract

This article deals with model averaging as an alternative regression technique for high-dimensional data especially in chemometrics where statistical approach is used to extract any information contained in a chemical dataset. Our simulation study indicated that model-averaging (MA) works better in high-correlated data than in low-correlated data. The result also designated MA with weighting procedure based on Mallows' Cp and Jackknife criteria produce better predictions compared to Akaike information criterion (AIC)-based of weight if the candidate models are constructed by randomly grouping the covariates. Moreover, the prediction performance tent to increase along with the number of variables in a candidate model. We illustrated the methods to regress the concentration of curcuminoid in curcumin specimen as a function of their spectra determined by Fourier Transform Infra-red (FTIR) instrument.

References

  1. S. Setiawan, K. A. Notodiputro, Continum regression with discrete wavelet transformation preprocessing, Jurnal ILMU DASAR 8 (2) (2009) 103–109.
  2. Erfiani, Pengembangan model kalibrasi dengan pendekatan bayes (studi kasus tanaman obat), Ph.D. thesis, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia (2005).
  3. A. Gusnanto, Y. Pawitan, Sparse alternatives to ridge regression: a random 205 effects approach, Journal of Applied Statistics 42 (1) (2015) 12–26.
  4. A. E. Raftery, D. Madigan, J. A. Hoeting, Bayesian model averaging for linear regression models, Journal of the American Statistical Association 92 (437) (1997) 179–191.
  5. K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.
  6. B. E. Hansen, Least squares model averaging, Econometrica 75 (4) (2007) 1175–1189.
  7. B. E. Hansen, J. S. Racine, Jackknife model averaging, Journal of Econometrics 167 (1) (2012) 38–46.
  8. S. Rahardiantoro, B. Sartono, A. Kurnia, Model averaging for predicting the exposure to aflatoxin b1 using dna methylation in white blood cells of infants, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 58, IOP Publishing, 2017, p. 012019.
  9. D. T. Salaki, A. Kurnia, B. Sartono. Model averaging method for supersaturated experimental design, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 31, IOP Publishing, 2016, p. 012016.
  10. T. Ando, K.-C. Li. A model-averaging approach for high-dimensional regression, Journal of the American Statistical Association 109 (505) (2014) 254–265.
  11. M.A. Ramadhan, B. Sartono, A. Kurnia. 2018. Partial Least Squares in Constructing Candidates Model Averaging. IJSRSET (4)1: 1459-1463)
  12. Claeskens G, Hjort N. 2008. Model Selection and Model Averaging. Cambridge University, New York

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Deiby Tineke Salaki, Anang Kurnia, Arief Gusnanto, I Wayan Mangku, Bagus Sartono, " Model Averaging Approach in Calibration Model, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 4, Issue 8, pp.189-195, May-June-2018.