The Impact of Recommendation System Overuse on the Subjective Wellbeing of Internet Users

Authors

  • Morrant Hemans  School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
  • Dickson Kofi Wiredu Ocansey  Key Laboratory of Medical Science and Laboratory Medicine of Jiangsu Province, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P.R. China. and Directorate of University Health Services, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRSET218156

Keywords:

Internet, Social Media Overload, Recommendation System Overuse, Self-Concept Clarity, Subjective Wellbeing

Abstract

The stress in identifying useful information on the internet facilitated the use of recommendation systems by e-commerce and social network platforms to help users find their interested information quickly. However, this study seeks to investigate the impact of recommendation system overuse on the subjective wellbeing of internet users. The study reviewed previous studies in developing a research framework from the SOBC model that identifies social media overload as a (Situation) that triggers the intentions of internet users (Organism) to excessively use recommendation systems on the internet based on their level of self-concept clarity (Behavior) which (Consequently) affect their subjective wellbeing. SmartPLS 3.0 and SPSS v.22 software were deployed to analyze the research data and discover links between the constructs. The obtained results of the study confirm that, overuse of online recommendation systems negatively affect users' subjective wellbeing.

References

  1. Belkhadir, I., Omar, E. D., & Boumhidi, J. (2019). An intelligent recommender system using social trust path for recommendations in web-based social networks. Procedia Computer Science, 148, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.035
  2. Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/209535
  3. Butzer, B., & Kuiper, N. A. (2006). Relationships between the frequency of social comparisons and self-concept clarity, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.017
  4. Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Ravallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 141–156.
  5. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Davis, T. R. V., & Luthans, F. (1980). A Social Learning Approach to Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1980.4288758
  7. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (1984). Subjective Well-Being-The Science of Happiness and Life Satisfaction. Psychological Bulletin, 542–575.
  8. Hadj Sassi, M. S., Jedidi, F. G., & Fourati, L. C. (2019). A New Architecture for Cognitive Internet of Things and Big Data. Procedia Computer Science, 159, 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.208
  9. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  10. Hu, G. N., Dai, X. Y., Song, Y., Huang, S. J., & Chen, J. J. (2015). A synthetic approach for recommendation: Combining ratings, social relations, and reviews. In Proc. of IJCAI, 1756–1762.
  11. Isinkaye, F. O., Folajimi, Y. O., & Ojokoh, B. A. (2015). Recommendation systems: Principles, methods and evaluation. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 16(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2015.06.005
  12. Karr-wisniewski, P., & Lu, Y. (2010). Computers in Human Behavior When more is too much?: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.008
  13. Lee, G., Lee, J., & Sanford, C. (2010). The roles of self-concept clarity and psychological reactance in compliance with product and service recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1481–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.001
  14. Liu, P., Tov, W., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., & Qiu, L. (2015). Do Facebook Status Updates Reflect Subjective Well-Being? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0022
  15. Luhmann, M. (2017). Using Big Data to study subjective well-being. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.006
  16. Malhotra, N. K. (1988). Self concept and product choice: An integrated perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(88)90029-3
  17. Mittal, B. (2015). Self-concept clarity: Exploring its role in consumer behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 46, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.11.003
  18. Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference Fluency in Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347
  19. Ramos, G., Boratto, L., & Caleiro, C. (2020). On the negative impact of social influence in recommender systems: A study of bribery in collaborative hybrid algorithms. Information Processing & Management, 57(2), 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102058
  20. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2015). Recommender Systems: Introduction and Challenges. In Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 1–34). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_1
  21. Sharma, L., & Gera, A. (2013). A Survey of Recommendation System?: Research. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), 4(5), 1989–1992.
  22. Shrestha, P. (2017). Overt vs Covert Behavior," in Psychestudy. https://www.psychestudy.com/behavioral/behavior/overt-vs-covert
  23. Slocum-Gori, S. L., Zumbo, B. D., Michalos, A. C., & Diener, E. (2009). A Note on the Dimensionality of Quality of Life Scales: An Illustration with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9303-y
  24. Smith, M., Wethington, E., & Zhan, G. (1996). Self-Concept Clarity and Preferred Coping Styles. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00516.x
  25. Tov, W. (2012). Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Daily experiences and well-being?: Do memories of events matter?? 26, 1371–1389.
  26. Whelan, E., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Brooks, S. (2020). Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance. Computers & Education, 143, 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692
  27. Yu, L., Shi, C., & Cao, X. (2019). Understanding the Effect of Social Media Overload on Academic Performance: A Stressor-Strain-Outcome Perspective. 6, 2657–2666. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.320
  28. Zhao, W., Ma, H., Li, Z., Ao, X., & Li, N. (2020). Improving social and behavior recommendations via network embedding. Information Sciences, 516, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.12.038

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

Issue

Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February-2021

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRSET

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Morrant Hemans, Dickson Kofi Wiredu Ocansey, " The Impact of Recommendation System Overuse on the Subjective Wellbeing of Internet Users, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp.239-247, January-February-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218156