Review on Seismic Behaviour of Diagrid Structure with Conventional Structure

Authors

  • Saurabh Babhulkar  M-Tech. Student, Structural Engineering , G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, India
  • Dr. Kuldeep Dabhekar  Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department, G H Raisoni College of Engineering Nagpur, India
  • Prof. S. S. Sanghai  Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department, G H Raisoni College of Engineering Nagpur, India
  • Isha P Khedikar  Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department, G H Raisoni College of Engineering Nagpur, India
  • Suresh Bhomle  Architect and Structural consultant, SB Arch and Associates , Nagpur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRSET218289

Keywords:

Diagrid Structural System, High rise buildings, Structural design, Staad pro

Abstract

The major forces that acts on any structure and which can be the cause of major disasters are earthquake and wind. Many researches all over the globe found that tall structures are more vulnerable to disasters as compared to smaller structures And are the major sources of social, environmental degradation after disaster. To minimize the effect of these major forces mentioned above we need to develop such techniques to make structures more resistant thereby minimizing the damage to the society and minimize environmental degradation. For any structure which is going to be constructed strength should be given outmost importance. Advances in development innovation, materials, underlying frameworks and insightful techniques for investigation and configuration worked with the development of tall structures. Underlying model of tall structures is represented by sidelong loads because of wind or quake. Parallel burden opposition of design is given by inside underlying framework or outside primary framework. Generally shear divider center, supported casing and their mix with outlines are inside framework, where parallel burden is opposed by midway found components. While outlined cylinder, supported cylinder underlying framework oppose parallel burdens by components gave on outskirts of design. It is vital that the chose underlying framework is to such an extent that the primary components are used adequately while fulfilling plan prerequisites. As of late diagrid underlying framework is embraced in tall structures because of its primary productivity and adaptability in building arranging. Contrasted with firmly dispersed vertical segments in outlined cylinder, diagrid structure comprises of slanted sections on the outside surface of building. Because of slanted segments sidelong loads are opposed by pivotal activity of the corner to corner contrasted with twisting of vertical segments in outlined cylinder structure. Diagrid structures for the most part don't need center since horizontal shear can be conveyed by the diagonals on the outskirts of building.

References

  1. Anju Krishna and Arathi S, “Analytical Study of Vertical Geometric Irregular Diagrid Structure and Comparison with Tubular Structure,”International Journal of Science and Research, Vol. 5, Issue 7, pp.1355-1361, 2016
  2. Khalid K. Shadhan, “OPTIMAL DIAGRID ANGLE TO MINIMIZE DRIFT IN HIGH-RISE STEEL BUILDINGSSUBJECTED TO WIND LOADS,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6, Issue 11, pp. 01-10, 2015
  3. Ravish Khan and Sangeeta Khan, “Analysis of Diagrids Using Symmetric and Asymmetric Plan Geometry,” International Journal of Recent Advances in Engineering & Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 9-13, 2016
  4. Snehal S. Mali , D. M. Joshi and Roshni John, “Response of High Rise Building with Different Diagrid Structural System,” International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue 5, pp. 144-150, 2107
  5. Chetan S.Pattar and Prof. Smt. Varsha Gokak, “ANALYSIS OF DIAGRID STRUCTURES WITH PLAN IRREGULARITY,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 05, Issue 08, pp. 435-438, 2018
  6. Irfan Saleem and Dr. Sunil Kumar Tengli, “Parametric Study on Asymmetric Diagrid Structures,” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 13, pp. 61- 66, 2018
  7. rupti A. Kinjawadekar and Trupti A. Kinjawadekar, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEISMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DIAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS IN HIGH RISE CONSTRUCTION,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 6, pp.315-323, 2018
  8. Swaral R. Naik, Dr. Satish N. Desai and Malhar P. Naik, “EARTHQUAKE RESPONSES OF DIAGRID BUILDINGS ANDCONVENTIONAL MOMENT FRAME BUILDINGS HAVINGDIFFERENT H/B RATIO CONSIDERING SEISMIC NON-LINEAR TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 13, pp. 1532-1539,2018
  9. Akshat and Gurpreet Singh, “DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DIAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEM IN HIGH RISE STEEL BUILDINGS,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 8, pp.71-79, 2018
  10. Trupti A. Kinjawadekar and Amit C. Kinjawadekar, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SEISMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DIAGRID STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS IN HIGH RISE CONSTRUCTION,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 6, pp. 315- 323, 2019
  11. K. Jani, P. V. Patel, “Analysis and Design of Diagrid Structural System for High Rise Steel Buildings”, Procedia Engineering, 51 (2013) 92–100.
  12. K. Kamath, S. Hirannaiah, J. C. K. B. Noronha, “An analytical study on performance of a diagrid structure using non-linear static pushover analysis”, Perspectives in Science, (2016) 8, 90–92.15K. S. Moon, “Diagrid Structures for Complex-Shaped Tall Buildings”, Procedia Engineering, 14 (2011) 1343–1350.
  13. R. D. Deshpande, S. M. Patil, S. Ratan, “Analysis and comparison of diagrid and conventional structural system”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), June 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 3, PP 2295–2300.
  14. T. H. Kim, H. U. Lee, Y. C. Kim, “Development of a building structural system using an IsoTruss® grid”, Procedia Engineering, 171 (2017) 1077–1084.
  15. Asadi E, Adeli H. Nonlinear behavior and design of mid-to-high rise diagrid structures in seismic regions. Eng J Am In st Steel Constr2018;55.
  16. Chopra, A. K. et al., Dynamics of structures, volume 3. Prentice Hall New Jersey, 1995.
  17. B K Raghu Prasad, Kavya A J “Comparative performance of octagrid and hexagrid lateral load resisting systems for tall building structure”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2014.
  18. Nishith B. Panchal, Vinubhai R. Patel, “Diagrid structural system: strategies to reduce lateral forces on high-rise buildings”, International Journal Of Research In Engineering And Technology, 2014
  19. Kiran Kamath and Nawaz Ahamed, “Effect of aspect ratio on performance of diagrid structure circular in plan”, 2015.
  20. Khushbu D. Jani, Paresh V. Patel, “Design of diagrid structural system for high rise steel buildings as per indian standards,” ASCE Structures Congress, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Saurabh Babhulkar, Dr. Kuldeep Dabhekar, Prof. S. S. Sanghai, Isha P Khedikar, Suresh Bhomle, " Review on Seismic Behaviour of Diagrid Structure with Conventional Structure, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp.386-391, November-December-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218289