A Study of Class Interaction Analysis Using Flanders's FIAC

Authors

  • Mukesh Sharma  Research Scholar, Central Sanskrit University Bhopal Campus, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Prof. Nilabh Tiwari    Professor, department of education , Central Sanskrit University Bhopal Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRSET218432

Keywords:

Interaction Analysis, Teacher Talk, Pupil Talk, Indirect Influence, Direct Influence

Abstract

Interaction Analysis is a technique for capturing quantitative and qualitative dimensions of teacher verbal behaviour in the classroom. As an observational system, it captures the verbal behaviour of teachers and students that is directly related to the social – emotional climate of the classroom. Interaction Analysis is a tool used in the classroom to capture quantitative and qualitative aspects of verbal instructor behaviour. It captures the verbal behaviour of teachers and students as an observational device that is directly linked to the social-emotional environment of the classroom. Interaction Analysis (IA) theoretical assumptions are that verbal contact is prevalent in a typical classroom situation; the teacher exerts a great deal of control on the student and the behavior of the student is influenced to a great extent by this form of teacher behavior seen. The ten-category structure of Flanders, which aims to categories all the verbal actions to be found in this paper. The aim is to promote the implementation of FIAC in the educational process in schools, as the quantity and consistency of teacher-student interaction is a vital element of effective teaching and improved learning in the classroom.

References

  1. Agarwal, J.C. (2002). ‘Educational Research’ Arya Book Depot, Agra.)
  2. Agarwal, Y.P. (1986). “Statistical Method, Concept, Applications and Computations”; Sterling Publishers India; New Delhi, Bangalore, P.275, pp. 185-187.
  3. Arora, G.L. and Saroj (1999). “Paradigm Shift in Instruction and Classroom Processes: Implications for Teacher’ In Service Education”. Quest in Education; XXIII
  4. Berenson, S.R. (1980). The skills of teaching: Amherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press.
  5. Bhavnagar, O.P. (2002). “Education and Communication for development” Oxford and LVS publishing company Pt. Ltd, New Delhi.
  6. Inamullah, M. (2005). Patterns of classroom interaction at different educational levels in the light of Flanders’ interaction analysis. PhD. Thesis Retrieved Sept.26, 2012, from http://eprintshec.goal.pk
  7. Jasraj, Kaur. (2013). Flanders interaction analysis category system (FIAC). Distance Education PUP
  8. Newman, M. (2001). PEPBL Methodology, Working Paper 6: Flanders Interaction Analysis.
  9. Niki,F.R. (2011). Flanders Interaction Analysis. Retrieved April 23, 2015, from http://www.slideshare.net/selvabarady/flanders-interaction-analysis
  10. Tisher, R.P. (2007) Classroom Interaction Analysis: the new religion. Journal Research in Science Education 2: 35 – 49.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Mukesh Sharma, Prof. Nilabh Tiwari , " A Study of Class Interaction Analysis Using Flanders's FIAC , International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp.171-179, July-August-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218432