Optimization and an Investigation on Different Optimum Design Configurations of an Eccentric Twin-Cam Compound Bow

Authors

  • Onur Denizhan  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Batman University, Batman, Türkiye
  • Meng-Sang Chew  Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2411144

Keywords:

Compound Bow, Eccentric Twin-Cam, Optimization, Optimum Design, Potential Energy

Abstract

Many patents have been issued for compound bows since they were invented. However, there is just a limited number of research articles on the subject. Besides the dynamics of the compound bow and arrow, the kinematics of the compound bow configuration is significant for the compound bow performance. In this article, an eccentric circular twin-cam compound bow, reported in [7,8] is optimized and several different design configurations of it are investigated. The objective of the optimization in this study is to maximize the stored potential energy at the drawn position. Only three parameters are chosen in this study: the distances between large and small cam geometric centers from the axle, and the angle subtended at the axle between geometric centers of the small and large cams while keeping the main geometry of the compound bow (limb lengths, cam radii and riser length) intact. A total of nine different optimum design configurations are investigated by changing the boundary conditions for the design variables. These are presented and results are discussed.

References

  1. Allen, H. W. Archery bow with draw force multiplying attachments. USA, Mo. Patent 3,486,495. 1969. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3486495A/en
  2. Bott, S. Optimal design of the limb in compound bows. M.Sc. thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia, USA, 2019. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/72270
  3. Denizhan, O., Chew, MS. "Optimum Design of an Archery Twin Round-Wheel Compound Bow." Proceedings of the ASME 2020 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering ConferenceVolume 10: 44th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference (MR). Virtual, Online. August 17–19, 2020. V010T10A027. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2020-22473
  4. Tiermas, M. An advanced model of the round-wheel compound bow. Meccanica 51, 1201–1207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0262-5
  5. Tiermas, M. A model of the twin-cam compound bow with cam design options. Meccanica 52, 421–429 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0395-1
  6. Tiermas, M. The round-wheel compound bow model revisited: a new extension. Sports Eng 20, 155–162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-017-0225-2
  7. Denizhan, O. Incorporation of kinematic analysis, synthesis and optimization into static balancing. Ph.D. thesis, USA, Lehigh University, (2021). https://www.proquest.com/docview/2580344031?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
  8. Denizhan, O. and Chew, MS. A systematic kinematic analysis and experimental verification of an eccentric twin-cam compound bow. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science (Under review).
  9. Venkataraman, P. Applied optimization with MATLAB programming. 2nd edition, Wiley Publishing, (2009).https://www.wiley.com/en-sg/exportProduct/pdf/9780470084885
  10. Global optimization toolbox release notes. The MathWorks, Inc., March 2021 (R2021a) edition, (2021). https://www.mathworks.com/help/gads/release-notes.html

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Onur Denizhan, Meng-Sang Chew "Optimization and an Investigation on Different Optimum Design Configurations of an Eccentric Twin-Cam Compound Bow" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp.291-299, January-February-2024. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2411144