A Comparative Study on the Performance of Gene Expression Programming and Machine Learning Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET1218226Keywords:
Evolutionary Algorithms, Gene Expression Programming, Machine Learning, Artificial Neural Network, Polynomial RegressionAbstract
Usually, evolutionary algorithms are used to provide strong approximations to problems that are difficult to solve with other methods. Gene expression programming (GEP) is a type of evolutionary algorithm used in computer programming to generate computer programs or models. These computer programs are complex tree structures that, like a living organism, learn and adapt by modifying their sizes, shapes, and composition. In the present work, a comparison study was made among GEP and the standard prediction techniques to find the best predicting model on the BOSTON HOUSING dataset. Three approaches viz. GEP, ANN and polynomial regression were implemented on the dataset. The study showed how the three methods solve the problem of high bias and high variance and which one outperforms the other. The research work, however, gave a glimpse of the actual limitations and advantages of the methods on one another indicating the dependency of method on the type of data used. The results conclude the comparison of different methods on different performance metrics. The GEP model however reduced the problem of high bias and high variance by giving a slight difference between the train and test accuracy but was not able to outperform ANN and polynomial regression in terms of performance metrics.
References
- Rechenberg, Ingo (1973). Evolutionsstrategie. Stuttgart: Holzmann-Froboog. ISBN 3-7728-0373-3.
- Roy, Sumit & Ghosh, Ashmita & Das, Ajoy & Banerjee, Rahul. (2014). A comparative study of GEP and an ANN strategy to model engine performance and emission characteristics of a CRDI assisted single cylinder diesel engine under CNG dual-fuel operation. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 21. 814-828. 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.024.
- Ostertagova, Eva. (2012). Modelling Using Polynomial Regression. Procedia Engineering. 48. 500–506. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.545.
- Ferreira, Candida. (2001). Gene Expression Programming: A New Adaptive Algorithm for Solving Problems. Complex Syst. 13.
- Shuhua Gao. (2020). geppy: a Python framework for gene expression programming.
- Sadjadi, Farzad. (2004). Comparison of fitness scaling functions in genetic algorithms with applications to optical processing. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. 5557. 10.1117/12.563910.
- Peng, Yuzhong & Yuan, ChangAn & Qin, Xiao & Huang, Jiangtao & Shi, YaBing. (2014). An improved Gene Expression Programming approach for symbolic regression problems. Neurocomputing. 137. 293–301. 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.05.062.
- Nwankpa, Chigozie & Ijomah, Winifred & Gachagan, Anthony & Marshall, Stephen. (2020). Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learning.
- Ruppert, David. (1996). Local polynomial regression and its applications in environmental statistics. Statist Environ. 3.
- Jolliffe, Ian. (1986). Principal Component Analysis. Springer: Berlin, Germany. 87. 41-64. 10.1007/b98835.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRSET

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.