Analysis of Slow Steaming of Ship and Its Impacts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET12310210Keywords:
Slow Steaming, Operating Costs, Fuel Consumption, Energy Efficiency, EnvironmentAbstract
Global trade heavily depends on shipping industry. Growth in seaborne trade causes the increase in fuel consumption and hence higher emissions which are directly related to the issues of global warming. Now, the world is also facing a drastic increase in fuel prices as a consequence of geopolitical conflict between Russia and Ukraine. One of the most effective ways to solve these problems in the maritime industry is to use the slow steaming method which is very cost-effective to implement. Slow steaming involves purposefully lowering ship speed to reduce bunker fuel consumption and also results in lower emissions. Therefore, this method is expected to bring a win-win outcome in the face of environmental damage resulted from GHG emissions and soaring fuel prices. This paper seeks to ascertain whether slow steaming can be used to compensate for the higher expenses associated with using cleaner fuels to comply with the stricter environmental regulations set out by International Maritime Organization. The impacts of using this method were evaluated by three points of view – economic, technical and legal. The results show that slow steaming can reduce the increasing bunker cost for using MGO instead of HFO but still cannot fully compensate for it.
References
- A. Rahman, "A Decision Making Support Of The Most Efficient Steaming Speed For The Liner Business Industry," European Journal of Business and Management, vol. 4, pp. 37-49, 2012.
- Cariou, P. (2011). Is slow steaming a sustainable mean for reducing liner shipping CO2 emissions? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 260 -264.
- Dagkinis, I. & Nikitakos, N. 2015. Slow Steaming Options Investigations Using Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Method.
- Global Average Bunker Price. https://shipandbunker.com/prices/av/global/av-glb-global-average-bunker-price. Accessed 2022-3-3
- Gross tonnage. 2013a. http://www.grosstonnage.com, search word ”Andromeda J”. Accessed 2022- 12-29.
- Kontovas, C. and Psaraftis, H.N. (2010) ‘Reduction of emissions along the maritime intermodal container chain: operational models and policies’, IAME 2010: Proceedings of the 2010 IAME Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Maloni, Michael, Paul Aliyas Jomon and Gligor M David,2013. Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers, Maritime Economics & Logistics 15(2):151–171.
- MAN. 2012. Slow Steaming Practices in the Global Shipping Industry, Results of a survey conducted by MAN PrimeServ in Late 2011 among representatives of the global container, bulk and tanker shipping industry. https://www.swedishclub.com/upload/Loss_Prev_Docs/Machinery/MAN%20PrimeServ%20%20Slow%20Steaming%20Rapport%202012%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed 2022-3-3
- CE Delft et.al (2010). Going Slow to Reduce Emissions. Seas at Risk.
- UNCTAD.(2022). Review of Maritime Transport 2022. (Sirimanne et al.) Geneva: UNITED NATIONS.
- Unifeeder.2013. Operational schedule, w.19-23. http://www.unifeeder.com/C125702600606908/sysOakFil/ScheduleColor/$File/colorschedul e.pdf. Accessed 2022-12-10.
- Wiesmann, Andreas. 2010. Slow steaming-a viable long-term option? , Wärtsilä Technical Journal, 2: 49-55.
- Wong, E., Tai, A., Lau, H., & Raman, M. (2015, June). An utility-based decision support sustainability model in slow steaming maritime operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 78, 57-69.
- Zanne Marina, Pocuca Milojka, BajecPatricija. 2013. Environmental and economic benefits of slow steaming. Transportation and Maritime Science. 2(02): 123-127
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRSET

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.