Prognostication of Concrete Characteristics with Coconut Shell as Coarse Aggregate Partial Percentile Replacement

Authors

  • Deepak T. J.  Head of Discipline, Civil Engineering, FOSTEM, INTI International University, Nilai Malaysia
  • Jalam A. A.  School of Civil Engineering, University of East London, Malaysia Campus, Malaysia
  • Eric Loh  Associate Dean, Civil Engineering, FOSTEM, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia
  • Siow Yun Tong  Senior Lecturer, Civil Engineering, FOSTEM, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia
  • Sudesh Nair  Senior Lecturer, Civil Engineering, FOSTEM, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia
  • Panjehpour  Senior Lecturer, Civil Engineering, FOSTEM, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia

Keywords:

Coconut Shell (CS), Partial, Percentile, Aggregates, Water-Binder Ratio, Concrete

Abstract

In this constructed environment, the rising cost of building construction materials is the issue of great concern. The prices of building materials are rising day by day. The coarse aggregates are the main ingredients of concrete. In this paper, the utilization of coconut shell as a replacement for coarse aggregate has been discussed based on the results obtained from comprehensive experimental results. The construction industry totally relies on cement, sand and aggregates for the production of concrete. Properties of concrete with coconut shells (CS) as aggregate partial percentile replacement were studied. Control concrete with normal aggregate and CS concrete with 10 - 50% coarse aggregate replacement were prepared with constant water – binder ratio of 0.45. For all mixes, workability, density, water absorption, compressive strength flexural strength and tensile strength were determined at 7, 14 and 28 days. The results showed a steady decline in the workability. The density results for concrete cube and beam specimens shows general decrease in physical property due to CS replacement. The water absorption tests showed that the percentage water absorption increases with increase in the percentage replacement level of coarse aggregate with CS. The compressive, flexural and tensile strength of CS concrete were found to be lower than normal concrete

References

  1. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Transportation Applications of Recycled Concrete Aggregate—FHWA State of the Practice National Review. Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 1-47.
  2. Transport Research Laboratory. A review of the use of waste materials and by-products in road construction. contractor report 358, 1994.
  3. WRAP. Use of the demolition protocol for the Wembley development. The Waste & Resources Action Programme, Wrap-Report No AGG0078. Oxon, UK, 2006; p.68.
  4. William H. Langer, Lawrence J. Drew, Janet S. Sachs. Aggregate and the environment, American Geological Institute, 2004.
  5. Filipponi P, Polettini A, Pomi R, Sirini P. Physical and mechanical properties of cementbased products containing incineration bottom ash. Waste Management 2003; 23(2): 145–156.
  6. Dhir RK, Paine KA, Dyer TD, Tang MC. Value-added recycling of domestic, industrial and construction arisings as concrete aggregate. Concrete Engineering International 2004; 8 (1): 43–48.
  7. Poon CS, Shui ZH, Lam L, Fok H, Kou SC. Influence of moisture states of natural and recycled aggregates on the slump and compressive strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 2004; 34(1): 31–36.
  8. Khatib ZM. Properties of concrete incorporating fine recycled aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research 2005; 35(4): pp. 763–769.
  9. Andrade LB, Rocha JC, Cheriaf M. Evaluation of concrete incorporating bottom ash as a natural aggregates replacement. Waste Management 2007; 27(9): 1190–1199.
  10. M. R. Jones, L. Zheng, A. Yerramala, K. S. Rao. Use of Recycled and Secondary Aggregates in Foamed Concretes. communicated, Magazine of Concrete Research, 2012.
  11. E.A. Olanipekun, K.O. Olusola, O. Ata. A comparative study of concrete properties using coconutshell and palm kernel shell as coarse aggregates. Building and Environment 2006; 41(3):p297–301.
  12. K. Gunasekaran, P.S. Kumar, M. Lakshmipathy. Mechanical and bond properties of coconutshellconcrete. Construction and Building Materials 2011; 25(1): p 92–98.
  13. BS 1881. Part 102: 1983. ‘Testing Concrete: Method for Determination of Slump’. London: British Standard Institution.
  14. BS 1881. Part 114: 1983. ‘Testing Concrete: Method for Determination of Density of Hardened Concrete’. London: British Standard Institution.
  15. BS 1881. Part 116: 1983. ‘Testing Concrete: Method for Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes’. London: British Standard Institution.
  16. BS 1881. Part 118: 1983. ‘Testing Concrete: Method for Determination of Flexural Strength’. London: British Standard Institution.
  17. BS 1881. Part 103: 1993. ‘Testing Concrete: Method for Determination of Compacting Factor’. London: British Standard Institution.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-25

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Deepak T. J., Jalam A. A., Eric Loh, Siow Yun Tong, Sudesh Nair, Panjehpour, " Prognostication of Concrete Characteristics with Coconut Shell as Coarse Aggregate Partial Percentile Replacement, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 1, Issue 5, pp.45-50, September-October-2015.