How Does Item Difficulty Justify Learners' Poor Attendances in ELT Context?

Authors

  • Behnam Behforouz  Foundation English Department, University of Buraimi, Oman

Keywords:

Item Difficulty, Poor Attendance, ELT Context

Abstract

This study investigated the relation between degree of test difficulty and students' performances in midterm and final exams. For this purpose, 24 Arab students were selected. Examination of results revealed that of course there is a relation between these two variables but it is not a big gap.

References

  1. Alpert, R., & Haber, R. N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal and SocialPsychology, 61, 207–215.
  2. Arvey, R. D., Strickland, W., Drauden, G., & Martin, C. (1990). Motivational components of test-taking. Personnel Psychology, 43, 695-716.
  3. Ball, S. (1995). Anxiety and test performance. In C. D. Spielberger& P. R. Vagg (Eds.), Test Anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 107–113). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
  4. Brehm, S. S., Kassin, S., & Fein, S. (2005). Social Psychology, 6 th ed. Houghton Mifflin: New York.
  5. Cale, N., Fowler, Ch., &Rempfer,M. (2012). Text Anxiety and Learning Potential in College Students. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences. Vol. 11, 2012.
  6. Combs, H., Micheal, L., Fiore, B. & Poling, D. (2007). Easy Test or Hard Test, does it Matter? The Impact of Perceived Test DifficultyTime and Test Anxiety. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences. Vol. 6, 2007.
  7. Eady, S. (1999). An Investigation of Possible Correlation of General Anxiety with Performance in Eleven-plus Scores in Year 6 Primary School Pupils. Educational Psychology, 19 (3), 347–359.
  8. Ebel, R.L., &Frisbie, D.A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  9. Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review, 99 (2), 248–267.
  10. Eysenck, M.W., &Calvo, M.G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 409–434.
  11. Fairclough, S. H., Tattersall, A. J., & Houston, K. (2006). Anxiety and performance in the British driving test. Transportation Research Part F, 9, 43–52.
  12. Foos, P. W. (1992). Test performance as a function of expected form and difficulty. TheJournal of Experimental Education, 60, 205–211.
  13. Foos, P.W. & Fisher, R. P. (1988). Using tests as learning opportunities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), pp. 179-183.
  14. Gurung, R. A. R. (2005). How do students really study (and does it matter). Teaching of Pschology,32(4), 239-241.
  15. Hancock, D. R. (2001). Effects of Test Anxiety and Evaluative Threat on Students' Achievement and Motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, (5), 284–290.
  16. Hembree, Ray. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), pp. 47-77.
  17. Hong, E. (1998). “Differential stability of individual differences in state and trait test anxiety. “Learning and Individual Differences, 10,51-69.
  18. Hong, E. (1999). Test anxiety, perceived test difficulty, and test performance: temporal patterns of their effects. Learning and Individual Differences,11(4), 431-448.
  19. Hong, E., &Karstensson, L. (2002). Antecedents of state test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 348–367.
  20. Kellas, G., & Butterfield, E.C. (1971). Effect of response requirement and type of material on acquisition and retention performance in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 50–56.
  21. Kim, S. H., & Rocklin, T. (1994). The temporal patterns of worry and emotionality and their differential effects on test performance. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 7, 117–130.
  22. Kivimaki, M. (1995). Test anxiety, below-capacity performance, and poor test performance: Intrasubject approach with violin students. Personality and individual Differences, 18, 47–55.
  23. Lusk, S. L. (1981). Test anxiety, level and accuracy of predicted performance. Psychological Reports, 49, 527–532.
  24. Marso, R. N. (1969). The influence of test difficulty upon study efforts and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 6 (4), 621–632.
  25. Matlock-Hetzel, S. (1997). Basic Concepts in Item and Test Analysis. Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, January, 1997.
  26. Meijer, J. (1996). Learning potential, personality characteristics, and test performance. In Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K. &Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.) Learning Potential Assessment: Theoretical, Methodological, and Practical Issues. (pp. 341 – 360). Steenwijk, Netherlands: GrafischProduktiebedrijfGorter.
  27. Meijer, Joost. (2001). Learning potential and anxious tendency: test anxiety as a bias factor in educational testing. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 14, pp. 337-362.
  28. Miksch, K. L. (2003). Legal issues in developmental education: the impact of high-stakes testing. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 19 (2), 53–58.
  29. Nami, Y. (2006). The effects of test anxiety on listening test performance. System, 34, 317–340.
  30. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., &McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
  31. Putwain, D. (2007). Researching academic stress and anxiety in students: some methodological considerations. British Educational Research Journal, 33 (2), 207–219.
  32. Qayyum, R. & Ismail, Z. (2011). The Effects of Immediate Forewarning of Test Difficulty on Test Performance in Applied Educational Context. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 2, No.1, 2011.
  33. Rempfer, M., Hamera, E., Brown, C., & Bothwell, R. (2006). Learning proficiency on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in people with serious mental illness; What are the cognitive characteristics of good learners? Schizophrenia Research, 87, 316-322.
  34. Rocklin, T., & Thompson, J. M. (1985). Interactive effects of test anxiety, test difficulty, and feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 368–372.
  35. Rocklin, T. (1997). Self-adapted testing: Improving performance by modifying tests instead of examinees, Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 10 (1), 83–104.
  36. Sapp, M. (1993). Test anxiety: Applied research, assessment, and treatment intervention. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  37. Sapp, M. (1996). Three treatments for reducing the worry and emotionality components of test anxiety with undergraduate and graduate college students: Cognitive-behavioral hypnosis, relaxation therapy, and supportive counseling. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 79-87.
  38. Sarason, I. G. (1961). Test anxiety and the intellectual performance of college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(4), pp. 201-206.
  39. Sarason, S. B., Mandler, G., &Craighill, P. G. (1952). The effect of differential instructions on anxiety and learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 561–565.
  40. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929–938.
  41. Sax, G., Eilenberg, E. G., & Klockars, A. J. (1972). Achievement as a function of test item complexity and difficulty. The Journal of Experimental Education, 40, 90–93.
  42. Sax, G., & Reade, M. (1964). Achievement as a function of test difficulty level. American Educational Research Journal, 1b (1), 22–25.
  43. Seipp, B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4, 27-41.
  44. Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Preliminary professional manual for the Test Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  45. Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form V. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  46. Spielberger, C. D. (2009). Test Anxiety Inventory. InI. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  47. Thiede, K. W. (1996). The relative importance of anticipated test format and anticipated test difficulty on performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A (4), 901–918.
  48. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (1997). Studying the relationship between affective and metacognitive variables. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 10, 59–81.
  49. Trifoni, A. &Shahini, M. (2011). How Does Exam Anxiety Affect the Performance of University Students?Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol.2, No.2. 93-100.
  50. Vigneau, F., & Cormier, S. (2008). The factor structure of the state-trait anxiety inventory: An Alternative View. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90 (3), 280–285.
  51. Waugh, N. C. (1967). Presentation time and free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 39–44.
  52. Wiedl, K. H. (1999). Cognitive modifiability as a measure of readiness for rehabilitation. Psychiatric Services, 50(11), pp. 1411-1419.
  53. Weber, C. J., & Bizer, G. Y. (2006). The effects of immediate forewarning of test difficulty on test performance. The Journal of General Psychology, 133 (3), 277–285.
  54. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
  55. Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum Press.
  56. Zimmer, J. W., & Hocevar, D. J. (1994). Effects of massed versus distributed practice of test taking on achievement and test anxiety. Psychological Reports, 74, 915–919.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Behnam Behforouz, " How Does Item Difficulty Justify Learners' Poor Attendances in ELT Context?, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 2, Issue 5, pp.420-430 , September-October-2016.