Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Procedure as a Cancer Diagnosis Application Tool

Authors

  • I. Shirazu  University of Cape Coast, School of Agriculture and Physical Sciences Faculty of Physical Sciences, Department of Physics, Cape coast, Ghana
  • Y. B Mensah  University of Ghana Medical School, Department of Radiology, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra Ghana
  • T. A Sackey  National Centre of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Physics, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra Ghana
  • M. Boadu  Graduate School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
  • E K Eduful  Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Accra, Ghana
  • E. Sosu  Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Accra, Ghana
  • F. Hasford  Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Accra, Ghana
  • T B. Dery  Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Accra, Ghana
  • M. Pokoo-Aikins  Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Accra, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRSET1734125

Keywords:

DW-MRI, Water Diffusion, Hydroscopic, Visualization, Brain Tumor, Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Physical imaging technique described as Diffusion Weighted-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) is based on classically principle of Brownian motion, where the molecules are thermal agitated and is highly influenced by the cellular availability of water. The aim of this study is to discuss the use of DW-MRI as a cancer diagnostic application tool using the basic physics principles as versus other available procedures and modalities in terms of accuracy and acceptability. Based on extravascular diffusion measurements where the measured signal is related to tissue cellularity, tissue organization and extracellular space tortuosity and on the intactness of cellular membranes that are intrinsically hydrophobic. The methodology involve the application of DW-MRI procedure, to qualitatively and quantitatively access DW-MR images to diagnose brain tumors, prostate and other organ cancers compared to other imaging modalities including other MRI procedures. It also include safety assessment and other consideration before, during and after imaging with MRI as compare to other radiological modalities. The results of the data of ten (10) MRI centers and 112 DW-MRI images and 99 other procedure and modalities were analysed, 34% were prostate cases, 27% were brain cases and 39% formed all other cases. In addition, DW-MRI compare to other single imaging procedure formed 53% of all diagnostic procedure that had 87% accurate predictability of prostate and brain cases. It can therefore concluded that DW-MRI is the best single imaging procedure that can be used to diagnose prostate cancers and brain tumors. It has a major advantage of non-ionizing radiation technique, with multiple planes image acquisitions, together with superior soft tissue contrast. In addition its perfusion allow for precise tissue characterization rather than merely 'macroscopic' imaging and superior visualization of both active parts of the brain during certain activities and understanding of the underlying networks. However, there are two outstanding challenges of DW-MRI scans in Ghana: it is expensive as compared to other modalities and not safe for patients with some metal implants. Despite these challenges, its advantages override its disadvantages and therefore it is recommended to clinicians as the first diagnostic tool to use in prostate cancer and brain tumor diagnoses.

References

  1. Rudin M. Imaging readouts as biomarkers or surrogate parameters for the assessment of therapeutic interventions. Eur Radiol. 2007;17 (10):2441-2457.
  2. Johnston KC, Wagner DP, Wang XQ, Newman GC, Thijs V, Sen S, Warach S. Validation of an acute ischemic stroke model: does diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume offer a clinically significant improvement in prediction of outcome? Stroke. 2007;38(6):1820-1825. PubMed]
  3. Chenevert TL, Brunberg JA, Pipe JG. Anisotropic diffusion in human white matter: demonstration with MR techniques in vivo. Radiology. 1990;177(2):401-405. PubMed]
  4. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys. 1965;42:288-292.
  5. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168:497-505. PubMed]
  6. Koh DM, Brown G, Riddell AM, Scurr E, Collins DJ, Allen SD, Chau I, Cunningham D, deSouza NM, Leach MO, et al. Detection of colorectal hepatic metastases using MnDPDP MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) alone and in combination. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(5):903-910. PubMed]
  7. Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen RM, Norris DG, van Lookeren Campagne M, Nicolay K. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36 (6):847-857. PubMed]
  8. Mulkern RV, Gudbjartsson H, Westin CF, Zengingonul HP, Gartner W, Guttmann CR, Robertson RL, Kyriakos W, Schwartz R, Holtzman D, et al. Multicomponent apparent diffusion coefficients in human brain. NMR Biomed. 1999;12 (1):51-62. PubMed]
  9. Bennett KM, Schmainda KM, Bennett RT, Rowe DB, Lu H, Hyde JS. Characterization of 62. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Sekiguchi R, Nawano S. The effect of simultaneous use of respiratory triggering in diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5(3):129-136. PubMed]
  10. Westin CF, Maier SE, Mamata H, Nabavi A, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI. Med Image Anal. 2002;6(2):93-108. PubMed]
  11. Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Kucharczyk J, Mintorovitch J, Asgari HS, Wendland MF, Tsuruda J, Norman D. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology. 1990;176(2):439-445. PubMed]
  12. Lee JH, Springer CS., Jr Effects of equilibrium exchange on diffusion-weighted NMR signals: the diffusigraphic "shutter-speed" Magn Reson Med. 2003;49(3):450-458. PubMed]
  13. Norris DG. The effects of microscopic tissue parameters on the diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging experiment. NMR Biomed. 2001;14(2):77-93. PubMed]

Downloads

Published

2017-08-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
I. Shirazu, Y. B Mensah, T. A Sackey, M. Boadu, E K Eduful, E. Sosu, F. Hasford, T B. Dery, M. Pokoo-Aikins, " Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Procedure as a Cancer Diagnosis Application Tool, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp.660-667, July-August-2017. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET1734125