Evaluation of Non-Infilled and Infilled Framed Structure Using E-Tabs

Authors

  • Faria Aseem  Assistant Professor, Lords Institute of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India
  • Abdul Quadir  Sr.Structural Design Engineer, PIL Limited, Hyderabad, India

Keywords:

Multi Storeyed Building, E-Tabs Software, Infilled And Non Infilled Frame Structure

Abstract

Structural planning and design requires sound knowledge of science of structural engineering practical aspects, such as recent design codes, bye laws, backed up by ample experience, intuition and judgment. The purpose of standards is to ensure and enhance the safety, keeping careful balance between economy and safety. In the present study 5 story typical residential building of area 210 m2 is considered and analyzed with using E-Tabs 2015 Software. In this project the in-filled and non in-filled frame structures are analyzed and compared. The Infilled frame structures are provided with bricks in between beams and column It is emphasized to show the benefits of providing the brick element before analysis of structure or portal frame. This project has different details of the loads distributions and the amount of loads distributed in different beams as well as the bending moments, deflections in beams are studied for the comparative study of In-filled and Non In-filled structures. The various values of bending moment and deflection between In-filled and non in-filled structures are compared after analysis and concluded that which is more economical. Generally the non in-filled frame structures are preferred in the market but from this project it is emphasized to use infilled frame structures for the analysis as it is economical. Here after this analysis the deflection in non in filled frame is found to be 4 time than the deflection in beam of in-filled frame structure.

References

  1. IS 456:2000(reinforced concrete for general building construction)
  2. IS 875, part 1 1987(dead loads for buildings and structures)
  3. IS 875, part 2, 1987(imposed loads for buildings and structure)
  4. SP 16(design aids for IS 456)
  5. SP 24(explanatory hand book for IS 456)
  6. Restrepo, J. I., Crisafulli, F. J. and Park, R., 1996, "Seismic Design Aspects for Tilt-Up Buildings", The Journal of the New Zealand Structural Engineering Society, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 9-24.
  7. Restrepo, J. I., Crisafulli, F. J. and Park, R., Earthquake Resistance of Structures: The Design and Construction of Tilt-up Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, Research Report 96-11, 1996.
  8. San Bartolomé, A., Quiun, D. and Torrealva, D., 1992, "Seismic Behaviour of a Three-Storey Half Scale Confined Masonry Structure", Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, Vol. 6, pp. 3527-3531.
  9. Zarnic, R. and Tomazevic, M., 1985, "Study of the Behaviour of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Seismic Loading", Proceedings of the Seventh International Brick Masonry Conference, Melbourne, Australia, Vol. 2, pp. 1315-1325.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Faria Aseem, Abdul Quadir, " Evaluation of Non-Infilled and Infilled Framed Structure Using E-Tabs, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp.929-934, September-October-2017.