Assessment of Causes and Effects of Variation on Construction Project Performance in South West Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2073135Keywords:
Variation, Project Delivery, Contractors, Construction ProjectsAbstract
The construction industry in Nigeria faces many problems, including the delay due to variations in project execution. This delay has been studied as a major setback in the Nigerian construction industry. In Nigeria, the construction industry's performance in terms of time has been observed to be poor. The objective of this study is to examine the variation of the construction project in order to determine the effect on the delivery of the project. The maximum performance of the project would be reached if the work always goes efficiently on time with the budget. The result of the variation is delay, cost overruns, quality defects and other negative impacts. The causes of variation were identified by a questionnaire survey for two higher education institutions. The results of the study identified the five main factors, including change of plan or scope, defective labour, customers' financial problems, unavailability of skills and desired profitability of the entrepreneur. In general, the study shows agreement among clients, consultants and contractors regarding the classification of the 20 factors that cause the variation. The results also reveal that factors related to clients are the main causes of variation, followed by factors related to contractors. An understanding of the causes and effects of the variation would be helpful in training professionals to assess the variation. In addition, the study would also help professionals take proactive measures to reduce the gaps on construction projects.
References
- H. Hamdan, Minimizing Variation Order on Construction Project Due to Design Change, (2012).
- F.M. Arain, L.S. Pheng, The potential effects of variation orders on institutional building projects, Facilities. (2005).
- C. Charoenngam, S.T. Coquinco, B.H.W. Hadikusumo, Web-based application for managing change orders in construction projects, Constr. Innov. 3 (2003) 197–215.
- A.P.C. Chan, C.M. Yeong, A comparison of strategies for reducing variations, Constr. Manag. Econ. 13 (1995) 467–473.
- P.A. Koushki, K. Al?Rashid, N. Kartam, Delays and cost increases in the construction of private residential projects in Kuwait, Constr. Manag. Econ. 23 (2005) 285–294.
- H.A. Odeyinka, A. Yusif, The causes and effects of construction delays on completion cost of housing projects in Nigeria, J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2 (1997) 31–44.
- N. Braimah, I. Ndekugri, Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methodologies, Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26 (2008) 789–799.
- J.D. Owolabi, L.M. Amusan, C.O. Oloke, O. Olusanya, P.F. Tunji-Olayeni, O. Dele, N.J. Peter, I.O. Omuh, Causes and effect of delay on project construction delivery time, Int. J. Educ. Res. 2 (2014) 197–208.
- R. Ndihokubwayo, An analysis of the impact of variation orders on project performance, (2008).
- M.A. Albhaisi, Factors causing variation orders in construction projects in gaza strip (Case Study: Qatar Projects), Factors Causing Var. Orders Constr. Proj. Gaza Strip (Case Study Qatar Proj. (2016).
- H. Du Plessis, P. Oosthuizen, Construction project management through building contracts, a South African perspective, Acta Structilia. 25 (2018) 152–181.
- E. Ho?kara, Ülkesel ko?ullara uygun sürdürülebilir yap?m için stratejik yönetim modeli, (2007).
- N.U.B.T.M. YUNUS, DEPARTMENT OF QUANTITY SURVEYING, (2007).
- N.K. Acharya, Y.-D. Lee, H.-M. Im, Design errors: tragic for the clients, J. Constr. Res. 7 (2006) 177–190.
- J. Blythe, A.S. Zimmerman, Business-to-business marketing management: a global perspective, Cengage Learning EMEA, 2005.
- J.D. Frame, Managing projects in organizations: how to make the best use of time, techniques, and people, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
- N.K. Acharya, Y. Dai Lee, H.M. Im, Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean perspective, Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. (2006).
- K.I. Gidado, Project complexity: The focal point of construction production planning, Constr. Manag. Econ. 14 (1996) 213–225.
- K. Remington, R. Zolin, R. Turner, A model of project complexity: distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity, in: Proc. 9th Int. Res. Netw. Proj. Manag. Conf., IRNOP, 2009.
- P.E.D. Love, Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 128 (2002) 18–29.
- H.R. Thomas, M.J. Horman, U.E.L. De Souza, I. Zav?ski, Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 128 (2002) 144–154.
- M. El Asmar, A.S. Hanna, W.-Y. Loh, Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 139 (2013) 4013012.
- N. Braimah, An investigation into the use of construction delay and disruption analysis methodologies, (2008).
- H. Avornorkadzi, Cost trend of variation orders in district assembly construction projects a case study of Jasikan District Assembly, (2017).
- P. Hughes, E. Ferrett, Introduction to health and safety at work, Routledge, 2011.
- D. Bower, A systematic approach to the evaluation of indirect costs of contract variations, Constr. Manag. Econ. 18 (2000) 263–268.\
- N.G.S. YAO, THE RIGHTS OF THE CONTRACTOR ON RECOVERY OF PAYMENT AFTER TERMINATION OF CONTRACT UNDER SECURITY OF PAYMENT REGIMES, (2013).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRSET

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.