Geochemical Mapping of Sulfur Within Olkaria Geothermal Field, Kenya

Authors

  • Muhanga Joel Joseph  Geothermal Training & Research Institute, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Kenya
  • Sang Paul K. Magut  Department of Chemistry, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Kenya
  • Onyancha Douglas Okerio  Department of Chemistry, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET20737

Keywords:

Sulfur, Up-flow, Recharge, Heat Source, Olkaria

Abstract

This research paper focuses on the geochemical mapping of Sulfur to characterize the Olkaria geothermal field, a field associated with geothermal power generation in the northeast of Nairobi. The current geochemical methods used are CO2 and N2 however, a discrepancy associated with the biogenic sources of CO2 renders it less reliable. Sulfur in geothermal systems is magmatic, hence its utilization can help solve these discrepancies. The study utilized sulfur present in the geothermal well waters to identify the main features of a magmatic hydrothermal system, their distribution within the Olkaria volcanic complex and how they relate with the Olkaria structures. Secondary data of the concentrations of H2S and SO4 2- was used for mapping using ArcMap tool within ArcGIS. The distribution of the magmatic H2S facilitated the mapping of the possible up-flow zones and the heat sources within the study area. SO4 2- was used to map possible recharge zones within the study area. The mappings, that is, the up-flow zones, the heat source and the recharge zones are important, because they increase knowledge on where exactly to drill production wells, make up wells and the reinjection wells. Geochemical mapping performed on other fluid chemical species such as CO2, Cl-, N2, as well as the temperature, facilitated the correlation with the sulfur concentration variations. The distribution of various concentrations of sulfur as well as the correlation parameters were shown by different color scales on the geochemical maps. From the maps, the field-scale distributions, enabled the visualization of which faults establish the fluid ascension areas and which are more closely related to recharge zones. The findings indicate that up-flow zones were affiliated to the NW-SE trending faults as well as the Olkaria Fault while the recharge zones were associated with the Gorge farm fault, the ring structure and the Ololbutot fault. Geochemical mapping of Sulfur proved to be an effective method in the characterization of a geothermal field. Its utilization to complement conventional methods, improves precision for well siting. It should therefore, not be ignored during exploration campaign.<

References

  1. Arnorsson, S. E. (1982). The Chemistry of Geothermal Waters in Iceland. III. Chemical Geothermometry in Geothermal Investigations. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 47:567–77.
  2. StefAnsson, A., Arnorsson, S., & Sveinbjörnsdottir, A.E. (2005). Redox reactions and potentials in natural waters at disequilibrium.
  3. Ramm, M. A. (1994). Porosity/Depth Trends in Reservoir Sandstones: Assessing the Quantitative Effects of Varying Pore-Pressure, Temperature History and Mineralogy Norwegian Shelf Data. Clay Minerals.
  4. Arnorsson, S. A. (2007). Fluid-fluid interactions in geothermal systems. Rev Mineral Geochem.
  5. Darling W.G., G. E. (1995). The origin of hydrothermal and other gases in the Kenyan Rift Valley. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta.
  6. Saitet, D. (2015). Synthesis of Well Test Data and Modelling of Olkaria South East Production Field.
  7. Clarke, M. C. (1990). Geological, Volcanological and hydrogeological controls of the occurrence of geothermal activity in the area surrounding Lake Naivasha. Ministry of Energy. Nairobi.
  8. KenGen 2012: Stratigraphy and Hydrothermal Alteration Mineralogy of Well OW-910 and OW-917. KenGen internal report: unpublished.
  9. Scott, S. (2011). Gas Chemistry of the Hellisheiði geothermal field. (Master’s Thesis).University of Iceland, Reykjavik.
  10. Armannsson, H., Gislason, G., and Hauksson, T. (1982), Magmatic Gases in Well Fluids Aid the Mapping of the Flow Pattern in a Geothermal System. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 46, 167-177.
  11. Opondo, K. (2008). ‘The Fluid Characteristics of Three Exploration Wells Drilled at Olkaria-Domes Field, Kenya.’ Stanford, California: Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University.
  12. Karingithi, C. A. (2010). Processes controlling aquifer fluid compositions in the Olkaria geothermal system. Vol.196. doc.10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.07.008. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.
  13. Glover, R. B., Lovelock, B., and Ruaya, J. R. (1981). ‘A novel way of using gas and enthalpy.’ New Zealand Geothermal Workshop. Auckland, New Zealand.
  14. Arnason, K., Eysteinsson, H., and Hersir, G. P. (2010). Joint 1D inversion of TEM and MT data and 3D inversion of MT data in the Hengill area, SW Iceland. Geothermics, 39, 13-34.
  15. Ambunya, M. (2014). Natural-State Model Update Of Olkaria Domes Geothermal Field. Reports 2014 Number 7, UNU-GTP. Iceland.

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Volume 7, Issue 3, May-June-2020

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRSET

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Muhanga Joel Joseph, Sang Paul K. Magut, Onyancha Douglas Okerio "Geochemical Mapping of Sulfur Within Olkaria Geothermal Field, Kenya" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp.55-61, May-June-2020. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET20737