A Review on Pull out Test on Exterior Beam-Column joint
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218373Keywords:
Beam–Column Joint, FRP, Headed Bar, Pull-Out Test, Cyclic LoadingAbstract
Conventional concrete loses its tensile resistance after the formation of multiple cracks. However, fibrous concrete can sustain a portion of its resistance following cracking to resist more loading. Use of the headed bar can offer a potential solution for these problems and may also ease fabrication, construction, and concrete placement. There have been many catastrophic failures reported in the past earthquakes, with Turkey and Taiwan earthquakes occurred in 1999, which have been attributed to beam–column joint failures. To achieve this performance level, special steel reinforcement details are required in the beam–column joint region of reinforced concrete framed structures. The experimental work carried out on four different arrangements of reinforcement of beam column joints. The aim of the research is to investigate the pull-out behavior such as strength, failure mode, and crack patterns of different arrangements of reinforcement in exterior beam column junctions. The transverse reinforcement of a joint reduces stresses by improving the confinement of concrete. All joints were tested by using reversed cyclic loading. In the first arrangement, the beam bars are extended in the column for distance Ld + (10xDia) from the inner face of column. This research studies the experimental behavior of full-scale beam-column space (three-dimensional) joints under displacement-controlled cyclic loading. Eleven joint specimens, included a traditionally reinforced one (without adequate shear reinforcement), a reference one with sufficient shear reinforcement according to ACI 318, and nine specimens retrofitted by ferrocement layers, were experimentally tested to evaluate a retrofit technique for strengthening shear deficient beam column joints.
References
- Subramanian, N., and D.S. Prakash Rao, “Design of Joints in RC Structures with Particular Reference to Seismic Conditions, The Indian Concrete Journal, Vol. 77, No. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 883-892.
- Jain, S.K., and C.V. R. Murty, (2002) ‘Proposed Draft Provisions and Commentary on Ductile Detailing of RC Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces (IS 13920’, Document No. IITK-GSDMA-EQ11-V4.0, IITK-GSDMA Project on Building Codes, 67 pp. http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/IITK-GSDMA/EQ11.pdf -Accessed on 17th July 2013).
- Hwang, S-J., H-J. Lee, T.-F. Liao, K.-C. Wang, and H.-H. Tsai, (2005), ‘ Role of hoops on Shear strength of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints’, ACI Structural Journal, Vol.102, No.3, May-June 2005, pp.445-453.
- Dhake Pravinchandra, Jape Anuja, Patil Hemant and Patil Yogesh “Behavior of exterior beam column joints with diagonal cross bars and headed bars “IJSCER Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2015
- S. Rajagopal, S. Prabavathy – “Investigation on the seismic behavior of exterior
- beam–column joint using T-type mechanical anchorage with hair-clip bar.”, Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences (2015) 27, 142–152.
- A. K. Kaliluthin, S. Kothandaraman,” Performance Evaluation of Exterior Beam–Column Joint with Core Reinforcement Technique Subjected to Reverse Cyclic Loading”, Arab J Sci Eng (2017) 42:3673–3687.
- Gregoria Kotsovou , Harris Mouzakis – “ Exterior RC beam–column joints: New design approach.”, Engineering Structures 41 (2012) 307–319.
- S.M. Kulkarni, Y.D. Patil - “ A Novel Reinforcement Pattern for Exterior Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joint.”, Procedia Engineering 51 ( 2013 ) pp. 184 – 193.
Codes:
- IS 456 (2000), “Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.” Bureau of Indian standard,2000.
- IS : 875 (Part 1) - 1987 " Code of Practice for design load(Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures”. Part 1 dead loads
- IS : 875 (Part 2) - 1983 " Code of Practice for design load(Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures”. Part 2 imposed loads.
- IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987 " Code of Practice for design load(Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures”. Part 2 wind loads.
- IS : 875 (Part 4) - 1987 " Code of Practice for design load(Other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures”. Part 4 snow loads.
- IS : 875 (Part 5) - 1983 " Code of Practice for design load(Other than Earthquake for Buildings and Structures”. Part 5 special loads and combination.
- IS : 875 (Part 5) - 2015 " Code of Practice for design load(Other than Earthquake for Buildings and Structures”. Part 5 special loads and combination.
- IS 5816 (1999): "Method of Test Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete".
- IS: 12269, "Specifications for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement".
- IS: 2386, "Methods of test for Aggregates for Concrete", reprinted 1997.
- IS: 269, "Specifications for 33 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement".
- IS: 383 (1970): "Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates From Natural Sources For Concrete".
Reference books :
- Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975), Reinforced Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 769 pp.
- Paulay, T., R. Park, and M. J. N. Priestley (1992). ‘Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints under Seismic Actions, ACI Journal, Vol. 75, No. 11, Nov. 1978, pp. 585-593.
- Paulay, T. and M. J. N. Priestley 1992, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 744 pp.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRSET

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.