Community Training and Sensitization as a Flood Mitigation Strategy Influencing Household Livelihood in NyandoFlood Plains, Kisumu County

Authors

  • Ombati Susan Moraa  PhD, Senior Technical and Vocational Trainer, Department of Social Work and Community Development, Ramogi Institute of Advanced Technology, Box 1738-40100 Kisumu-Kenya.
  • Raphael Nyonje  PhD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Extra-Mural Studies, University of Nairobi,9136 00200, Nairobi-Kenya
  • Dorothy Ndunge Kyalo  PhD, Senior Lecturer, Department of Open Distance and e-Learning (ODEL Campus), University of Nairobi, 30197-40100, Nairobi-Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218534

Keywords:

Training and sensitization, livelihood, flood mitigation, coping strategies

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence community participation in training and sensitization on household livelihood in Kano Plains in Nyando Sub-County, Kisumu County. The study adopted descriptive survey design and targeted household heads in Nyando plains, village elders and chiefs of the locations under study, local government authority representatives, District Disaster management officer representative in Nyando and the NGOs. A sample size of 385 was sufficient for a target population of 11,050. Multistage sampling was used to sample locations and sub locations while proportional sampling was used to sample the number of selected household where the households were grouped into different classifications. The sample size was 370 household heads plus 15 officers were working in Nyando flood plains. Purposive sampling was used to identify the 4 village elders and 4 chiefs, 1 Sub-County Local Authority Management Officer who represented the government, 1 Disaster Management Officer, and 5 managers from the NGOs. Questionnaires for household heads and interview schedules key informants were used for primary data collection. The study found that majority of the households had never attended training and sensitization programmes concerning floods with 42.1% and that the training and sensitization received was not of high quality (60.6%).The study found a strong positive correlation R = 0.582 which was statistically significant as p<0.01 (p < 0.001) between community participation in training and sensitization and household livelihood and that community participation in training and sensitization accounts up to 33.8% (R2 = .338) of variance in the outcome. The study concluded that community participation in training and sensitization influenced household livelihood. However, trainings and sensitization programmes were not regularly done due to financial constraints to facilitate the trainings.The study recommends that more training and sensitization should be conducted to the communities in flood prone areas on how to mitigate floods to ensure improvement of their household livelihood.

References

  1. APFM (2008), Organizing Community Participation for Flood Management. A tool for Integrated Flood Management.
  2. APFM (2011) Integrated Flood Management Tools Series. Flood Emergency Planning. Global Global Water Partinership and the World Meteorological Organization
  3. Bazarragchaa (2011).Community Participation in Disaster Risk Mitigation.A comparative study of Mongolia and Japan.Disaster Research Institute.
  4. Castillo, J., C. (2009). Probability Sampling and Randomization.Retrieved April 26 from Explorable.com:http//explorable.com/probability-sampling.CCFSC(Central Committee for Flood and Storm Control) (2006) National Strategy and  Action Plan for Disaster Prevention, Control and Mitigation in Vietnam: 2001 to 2020.September. CCFSC, Hanoi.
  5. Cottrell, A. (2005). Sometimes it’s a big ask but sometimes it’s a big outcome: Community Participation in Flood Mitigation. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Vol.20 No 3 August 2005
  6. India Water Partinership (2012). Report on Sensetization workshop on community resilience On climate change. Institute for Human Development. 
  7. IRP (2005).Livelihood.Guidance note on Recovery.
  8. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Society (2016). Saving Lives: Changing minds.Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Kenya :Floods.
  9. ISDR (2004) Training package on Natural Hazards and Early Warning for Training of Trainer in Kenya. Regional Office for Disaster in Africa. Printing: UNON, Publishing Services Section, Nairobi, ISO 14001: 2004-certified
  10. Kenya Bureau of Statistics (2014). Keeping you informed.   Economic survey 2014.ISBN9966-767-47-9.
  11. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement.1970 pp607-610.
  12. Okayo, J., Odera, P., &Omuterema, S., (2015). Socio economic characteristics of the community that determine ability to uptake precautionary measures to mitigate flood Disasters in Kano plains, Kisumu County Kenya.
  13. Oso, W. Y., &Onen, D., (2009).A general guide to writing research proposal and report. A handbook for beginning researchers.(re.ed)Nairobi; Kenya: Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.
  14. Telewa, C. (2011). Villagers spearhead Flood Management in Nyando. Kenya Today.
  15. Wallingford, H., (2005). Source Book for Sustainable Flood Mitigation Strategies.Department for International Development.Published by HR Wallingford Limited.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Ombati Susan Moraa, Raphael Nyonje, Dorothy Ndunge Kyalo "Community Training and Sensitization as a Flood Mitigation Strategy Influencing Household Livelihood in NyandoFlood Plains, Kisumu County" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp.278-284, September-October-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218534