Modelling Utilization of the Internet and Social Media Platforms for Sustainable Development of Women Entrepreneurs of Small Businesses

Authors

  • Roselida Maroko Ongare  Department of Information Technology, Kibabii University, Bungoma, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET229155

Keywords:

Social Media Platforms, Internet, Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Sustainable Development, Women Entrepreneurs, Small Businesses, Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn

Abstract

Sustaining technologies and innovations are important driving forces behind the modern day business and the working space. Sustaining technology and innovation enables businesses to improve their products and services in a way that makes them compete with competitors in the same market space. The Internet and social media platforms are sustaining technologies and innovations that are currently altering the economic, social and political landscapes by changing the way people live, do business and work. Proper and informed usage of these technologies in business can have the potentials of empowering entrepreneurs economically, socially as well as contributing to environmental conservation and protection. This research sought to develop a model that would encourage utilization of the Internet and social media platforms by women entrepreneurs of small businesses in rural areas. This was achieved by analyzing Internet usage, evaluating social media platforms usage by women entrepreneurs in rural parts of Siaya County in Kenya and developing a model of utilization of the Internet and social media platforms for sustainable development. The six social media platforms that were evaluated are Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube. The target population was women entrepreneurs of small businesses in Siaya County. Cochran formula was used to calculate the ideal sample size and sample size of 272 was used. A response rate of 91.91% was achieved. Simple random sampling was used to select one county out of 45 counties and snowball sampling technique was used to select the respondents. Questionnaires were used to collect data. The reliability of the research tool was arrived at using composite reliability test and Cronbach’s Alpha test whereas the validity of the research instrument was assessed using content and construct validity. Ethical issues arising from the research such as informed voluntary consent, no harm to participants, confidentiality of information and data integrity were accounted for. Data analysis was done using PLS-SEM statistical model and descriptive, inferential and predictive statistics that encompassed regression and correlation were used to analyze the data and develop and validate the model. The validity of the model was assessed and approved by ten SME experts and its applicability in business for sustainable development of entrepreneurs of small businesses was ascertained through simulation. The purpose of the study was achieved.

References

  1. International Telecommunication Union. (2013). ICT Statistics. Available at http://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx
  2. Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Elvira Ismagilova, D. Laurie Hughes, Jamie Carlson, Raffaele Filieri, Jenna Jacobson, Varsha Jain, Heikki Karjaluoto, Hajer Kefi, Anjala S. Krishen, Vikram Kumar, Mohammad M. Rahman, Ramakrishnan Raman, Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Jennifer Rowley, Jari Salo, Gina A. Tran, Yichuan Wang, Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions, International Journal of Information Management, Volume 59, 2021,102168,ISSN 0268-4012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401220308082)
  3. International Telecommunication Union. (2021) Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2021. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2021.pdf
  4. Kanvaria, V. K. & Bisht, S. (2016). Integrating ICT in education for sustainable development: a facilitator’s comprehension, International Journal of Education & Applied Sciences Research, Vol.3, Issue 06, Aug-Oct- 2016, pp 51-58 EISSN: 2349 –2899, ISSN: 2349 –4808 (Print)
  5. Ifeoma, A. B. (2014). Impact of ICT on Information Gathering and Dissemination of Television Reporters, New Media and Mass Communication ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online) Vol.29. Available at iiste.org/Journals/index.php/NMMC/article/viewFile/15525/15933
  6. Zuppo, C. M. (2012). Defining ICT in a boundaryless world: The development of a working hierarchy, International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT) Vol.4, No.3
  7. Singh, A. (2015). The Importance of Technology in Entrepreneurship. Available at http://www.epicentreuwindsor.ca/the-importance-of-technology-in-entrepreneurship/
  8. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2017). ITU Goal 10: Reduce Inequality. Available at http://www.itu.int/en/sustainable-world/Pages/goal10.aspx
  9. Internet Society. (2016). Global internet report 2016: Paths to our digital future. Available at https://future.internetsociety.org/
  10. Internet Society. (2015a). The Internet and Sustainable Development. https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2015/the-internet-and-sustainable-development/
  11. GSMA Connected Women & Altai Consulting. (2015). Bridging the gender gap: Mobile access and usage in low and middle-income countries. Available at https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/GSM0001_03232015_GSMAReport_NEWGRAYS-Web.pdf
  12. International Telecommunication Union, (2019). Measuring Digital Development Facts and Figures 2019. Available at https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2019.pdf
  13. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B. & Thierry, B. (2015). The Global Information Technology Report 2015: Innovating in the Digital Economy, World Economic Forum 2015
  14. Shepherd, D. A., and Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.
  15. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ bse.682
  16. Kamunge, M. S., Njeru, A., & Tirimba, O. I. (2014). Factors Affecting the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises in Limuru Town Market of Kiambu County, Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(1), 2250–3153. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-16148093
  17. Mohamad, M., Chin, O. (2018). The Effects of Internet Usage on Business Sustainability of Small Technology-based Rural Business in Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE). 7. 635-638. 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.23074. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330193084_The_Effects_of_Internet_Usage_on_Business_Sustainability_of_Small_Technology-based_Rural_Business_in_Malaysia
  18. Mohd. Zin, M. L. (2015). Determinants of Business Performance Among Rural Entrepreneur. In E-Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Science Research, ICSSR 2015 (Vol. 2015, pp. 114–121). Retrieved from ttp://worldconferences.net
  19. Mokhtar, N. F. (2015). Internet Marketing Adoption by Small Business Enterprises in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(1), 59–65. http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_1_Januaryr_2015/7.pdf
  20. Tarutė, A., Gatautis, R. (2014). ICT impact on SMEs performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 110. 1218-1225. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.968. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270847951_ICT_impact_on_SMEs_performance/citation/download
  21. Radzi, K. M., Nazri, M., & Nor, M. (2017). The impact of internal factors on small business success: a case of small enterprises under the felda scheme. Asian Academy of Management, 22(1), 27–55
  22. Entrepreneur. (2018). Seven Creative Ways to Boost Your Social Media Strategy. Available at https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/311384
  23. Dutta, S., Baller, S. and Lanvin, B. (2016). The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy. World Economic Forum 2016
  24. Detweiler, G. (2018). Ten Expert Social Media Tips to Help Your Small Business Succeed. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/allbusiness/2018/03/27/10-expert-social-media-tips-to-help-your-small-business-succeed/#55fc1e4e14a1
  25. Bone, D., Chui, M., Manyika, J. & Ventresca, M. (2013). The Social Economy: Unleashing Value and Productivity through Social Technologies. Available at https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/social-economy-unleashing-value-and-productivity-through-social-technologies
  26. Dunne, A., Lawlor, M. and Rowley, J. (2010), “Young people’s use of online social networking sites a uses and gratifications perspective”, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 46-58.
  27. Hossain, M.A. (2019), Effects of uses and gratifications on social media use: The Facebook case with multiple mediator analysis, PSU Research Review, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-07-2018-0023
  28. Vinney, C. (2020). What Is Uses and Gratifications Theory? Definition and Examples. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/uses-and-gratifications-theory-4628333
  29. Cheung, C.M.K., Chiu, P.Y. and Lee, M.K.O. (2011), “Online social networks: why do students use Facebook”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 1337-1343.
  30. arstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. Structural Equation Models: From Paths to Networks (Westland 2019). Psychometrical 85, 841–844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09719-0
  31. Statsoft (2013). Structural Equation Modeling, Statsoft Electronic Statistics Textbook. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/structural-equation-modeling/
  32. Blunch, N. J. (2008). The measurement model in SEM: confirmatory factor analysis. In Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS (pp. 127-156). SAGE Publications, Ltd, https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249345
  33. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W. and Boudreau, M.C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice,” Communications of the AIS 4 (7), 1-77.
  34. Chin, W.W., Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2008) Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16:4, 287-298, DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679160402
  35. Mailman School of Public Health. (2020). Path Analysis. https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/path-analysis
  36. Grapentine, T. (2000). Path Analysis Versus Structured Equation Modelling. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Terry_Grapentine2/publication/293700571_Path_vs_strutral_equation_modeling_do_the_relative_merits_of_path_analysis_and_structure_equation_modeling_outweight_their_limitiations/links/591994c4aca2722d7cfe47ca/Path-vs-strutral-equation-modeling-do-the-relative-merits-of-path-analysis-and-structure-equation-modeling-outweight-their-limitiations.pdf
  37. Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Diamantopoulos, A. (2011). Incorporating formative measures into covariance-based structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 335–358.Google Scholar
  40. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parida, A., Kumar, U., Galar, D. and Stenström, C. (2015), "Performance measurement and management for maintenance: a literature review", Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 2-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-10-2013-0067
  42. P. Kaur, J. Stoltzfus, V. Yellapu, “Descriptive statistics”. International Journal of Academic Medicine Online]. 4 (1) pp 60. https://www.ijam-web.org/text.asp?2018/4/1/60/230853
  43. G. G. Benjamin, S. Kevin, M. Aaron. (2017). “Inferential statistics and the use of administrative data in US educational research”. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 40(2), pp 214-220, DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1113249
  44. J. Christopher Westland. (2019). Structural Equation Models. 2019, Volume 22. ISBN: 978-3-030-12507-3
  45. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  46. Kock, N. (2015). A note on how to conduct a factor-based PLS-SEM analysis. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(3), 1-9.
  47. Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2016). Simpson’s paradox, moderation, and the emergence of quadratic relationships in path models: An information systems illustration. International Journal of Applied Nonlinear Science, 2(3), 200-234.
  48. Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares regression and structural equation models. Asheboro: Statistical Associates. Google Scholar

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

Issue

Volume 9, Issue 1, January-February-2022

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRSET

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Roselida Maroko Ongare "Modelling Utilization of the Internet and Social Media Platforms for Sustainable Development of Women Entrepreneurs of Small Businesses" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp.250-275, January-February-2022. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET229155