Cost-Time Optimization of a Construction project using Genetic-Algorithm approach
Keywords:
Multi-Objective Cost-Time Optimization, Genetic Algorithm.Abstract
People's daily necessities are provided for both directly and indirectly by the construction sector. A construction project often entails the use of various resources (such as equipment, materials, labour, etc.) to create a finished product (such as a building, a bridge, a water distribution system, etc.) that meets the needs of the intended consumers. Budget restrictions, contractual time restrictions, safety and health concerns, sustainability ratings, local building rules, and the desired degree of quality are just a few of the challenges faced in construction projects. As a result, there are several goals for a construction project, including maximum productivity, lowest cost, shortest duration, and specified quality, safety, and sustainability. When attempting to combine multiple objectives into the best possible answer, decision-making can be challenging. In this thesis, a GA model with 152 decision variables, 462 constraints, and 361 optimal solutions was suggested. This study suggests dynamic programming-based GA for equipment management issues because we thought it would be able to address these issues more effectively than conventional approaches. The method's objectives were to reduce overall project costs and increase equipment performance so that, in the event of equipment failure, backup equipment would be accessible. Furthermore, it was decided to treat the equipment failure rate as a fuzzy variable to increase the method's dependability. The model was put to the test using a real hydroelectric project in India. The new approach outperformed the conventional methods in searching in the same environment.
References
- Konak, A., Coit, D.W. and Smith, A.E., 2006. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(9), pp.992-1007
- Wang, C., Cheng, H.Z., Hu, Z.C. and Wang, Y., 2008. Distribution system optimization planning based on plant growth simulation algorithm. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 13(4), pp.462-467.
- Rao, R., 2010. PVV and Sivanagaraju, S., Radial Distribution Network Reconfiguration for Loss Reduction and Load Balancing using Plant Growth Simulation Algorithm. Int. J. Elect. Eng. Inform, 2(4), pp.266-277.
- Alothaimeen, I. and Arditi, D., 2019. Overview of Multi-Objective Optimization Approaches in Construction Project Management. In Multi-criteria Optimization-Pareto-optimal and Related Principles. IntechOpen.
- Chen, C. and Tiong, L.K., 2019. Using queuing theory and simulated annealing to design the facility layout in an AGV-based modular manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 57(17), pp.5538-5555.
- N., Sajadi, B., Kowsary, F. and Delgarm, S., 2016. Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: A simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO). Applied energy, 170, pp.293-303.
- G.R., Bandera, C.F., Temes, T.G.A. and Gutierrez, A.S.O., 2016. Genetic algorithm for building envelope calibration. Applied Energy, 168, pp.691-705.
- Kim, K., Walewski, J. and Cho, Y.K., 2015. Multiobjective construction schedule optimization using modified niched pareto genetic algorithm. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(2), p.04015038.
- Cheng, M.Y. and Tran, D.H., 2015. Opposition-based Multiple Objective Differential Evolution (OMODE) for optimizing work shift schedules. Automation in Construction, 55, pp.1-14.
- Karatas, A. and El-Rayes, K., 2015. Optimizing tradeoffs among housing sustainability objectives. Automation in Construction, 53, pp.83-94.
- Erdogan, S.A., Šaparauskas, J. and Turskis, Z., 2017. Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach. Procedia engineering, 172, pp.270-276.
- Albayrak, G. and Özdemir, ?., 2017. A state of art review on metaheuristic methods in time-cost trade-off problems. International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research, 6(1), pp.30-34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRSET

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.