Numerical Solution of Inviscid and Viscous Flow Across NACA0010 Airfoil with different Angles of Attack

Authors

  • Mohammad Erfan Khodabakhshi  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
  • Masoud Aryanpour  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET23103211

Keywords:

Airfoil, viscous flow, inviscid flow, NACA0010, ANSYS FLUENT, angle of attack

Abstract

The role of the airfoil in all engineering fields is very important. Airfoil designs are utilized in various applications such as aircraft wings, helicopter rotor blades, sails, fans, and turbine compressors. In the case of aircraft, airfoils are accountable for generating lift force and determining if it is adequate for balancing the aircraft's weight, as well as determining the amount of drag force that should be applied to the body. They also play a vital role in optimizing blade performance, as well as the heat and operational efficiency of turbines. Airfoils are moving in the flow passing by them, and they show different responses based on many parameters such as whether the flow is smooth or turbulent, viscous or inviscid, flow velocity, angle of attack, multidimensionality of velocity components, etc. For aeronautics vehicles and wind turbines, a large number of studies have been conducted to analyze aerodynamic forces on two dimensional airfoils as well as flow phenomena associated with different Reynolds numbers. Main object of this research is to figure out the flow characteristics around the airfoil body and analyze aerodynamic performance of airfoil. In order to investigate the computational efficiency of flow models, numerical examination has been done for flow across NACA0010 airfoil by using 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver, ANSYS FLUENT 18.0, at various angle of attack (0o to 13o) for inviscid flow and (-30o to 30o) for viscous flow. Lift and drag coefficients and C p for lower and upper airfoil surface and velocity diagram based on different angle of attack has been solved for the sample under two different flow regimes. The contours of velocity were simulated, and stall point was noticed from 13° angle of attack in inviscid flow and 24o in viscous flow. In the non-viscous state, lift coefficient and drag coefficient was higher, in comparison with viscous flow.

References

  1. SRL. Samion and MSM. Ali. "Aerodynamic noise measurement in anechoic wind tunnel of rod-airfoil with leading edge serrations," Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol.47, 2018, pp. 97-107.
  2. P. Rojratsirikul, Z. WangI. Gursul. “Unsteady fluid–structure interactions of membrane airfoils at low Reynolds numbers," Animal Locomotion, 2010, pp. 297-310.
  3. O. Ozgener, L. Ozgener. "Exergy and reliability analysis of wind turbine systems: a case study." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol.11, 2007, pp. 1811-1826.
  4. J. Winslow, H. Otsuka, B. Govindarajan, I. Chopra. "Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105)." Journal of aircraft, vol.55, 2018, pp. 1050-1061.
  5. X. Shen, E. Avital, G. Paul, MA. Rezaienia, P. Wen, T. Korakianitis. "Experimental study of surface curvature effects on aerodynamic performance of a low Reynolds number airfoil for use in small wind turbines." Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol.8, 2016, pp. 1-14.
  6. SA. Khan, et al. "Comparing the effect of different turbulence models on the CFD predictions of NACA0018 airfoil aerodynamics." CFD Letters, vol. 12, Issue. 3, 2020, pp. 1-10.
  7. Y. Kamada, T. Maeda, J. Murata, Y. Nishida. "Effect of turbulent inflows on airfoil performance for a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine at low Reynolds numbers (Part II: Dynamic pressure measurement)." Energy, vol. 112, 2016, pp. 574-587.
  8. R. Gerakopulos, M. Boutilier, S. Yarusevych. "Aerodynamic characterization of a NACA 0018 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers." 40th Fluid dynamics conference and Exhibit, 2010, p. 4629.
  9. H. Aono, M. Anyoji, D. Hamada, S. Wakui, T. Tatsuwaka. "A study on development of airfoil shape toward low reynolds-number dependence of aerodynamic characteristics under low-reynolds-number-flow conditions." AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018, p. 1085.
  10. I. ?ahin, A. Acir. "Numerical and experimental investigations of lift and drag performances of NACA 0015 wind turbine airfoil." International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, vol.3, 2015, pp. 22-25.
  11. https://garudauniverse.com/viscous-vs-inviscid-flow.
  12. F. Wang, L. Bai, J. Fletcher, J. Whiteford, D. Cullen. "The methodology for aerodynamic study on a small domestic wind turbine with scoop." Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, vol. 96, 2008, pp. 1-24.
  13. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_coefficient.
  14. MP. Singh, DMS. Khidiya, S. Soni. "CFD Simulation of an Airfoil at different Angle of Attack." International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, vol. 2, Issue. 3, 2016, pp. 773-776.
  15. M. Shinde, V. Shinde, S. Shirode, D. Shriwas. "Simulation of flow over airfoil." Int Res J Eng Technol, 2021, pp. 11-17.
  16. RK. Singh, MR. Ahmed, MA. Zullah, YH. Lee. “Design of a low Reynolds number airfoil for small horizontal axis wind turbines, “Renewable energy, vol.42, 2012, pp. 66-76.
  17. http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=naca0010-il.
  18. WY. Tey, RYW. Hong, Y. Asako, HS. Kang, KC. Ng. "Analysis on computational efficiency of convection discretization schemes in SIMPLE algorithm," Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 58, 2019, pp. 100-117.
  19. R. Lanzafame, M. Messina. "Design and performance of a double-pitch wind turbine with non-twisted blades, " Renewable Energy, vol. 34, 2009, pp. 1413-1420.
  20. MS.Selig, JJ. Guglielmo. "High-lift low Reynolds number airfoil design." Journal of aircraft, vol.34, 1997, pp. 72-79.
  21. J. Yao, W. Yuan, J. Wang, J. Xie, H. Zhou, M. Peng, Y. Sun. "Numerical simulation of aerodynamic performance for two dimensional wind turbine airfoils," Procedia Engineering, vol. 31, 2012, pp. 80-86.
  22. J. Johansen, JN. Sørensen. "Prediction of laminar /turbulent transition in airfoil flows," Journal of aircraft, vol. 36, 1999, pp. 731-734.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Mohammad Erfan Khodabakhshi, Masoud Aryanpour "Numerical Solution of Inviscid and Viscous Flow Across NACA0010 Airfoil with different Angles of Attack" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp.268-279, July-August-2023. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET23103211