Geological and Hydrological Perspectives on Groundwater Management in Changing Environments

Authors

  • Dr. Ghanshyam Shakar   Assistant Professor, MATS School of Engineering and Information Technology, Chhattisgarh, India

Keywords:

Groundwater management, Hydrological modeling, Geological perspectives, Sustainable water resources, Environmental change impacts

Abstract

Groundwater management has emerged as a critical challenge in the face of changing environmental conditions, driven by climate variability, population growth, and increasing water demands. This paper explores geological and hydrological perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of sustainable groundwater resource management. Geological factors, such as aquifer structure, permeability, and lithology, directly influence groundwater storage and recharge rates. Meanwhile, hydrological dynamics, including precipitation patterns, surface runoff, and evapotranspiration, shape groundwater availability and sustainability. This study examines the interplay between these factors in the context of changing environmental conditions. Emphasis is placed on the role of advanced hydrological modeling and geospatial technologies in assessing groundwater recharge and depletion rates. Case studies highlight the impacts of urbanization, agricultural practices, and land-use changes on groundwater quality and quantity. Furthermore, adaptive management strategies, such as artificial recharge, managed aquifer recharge (MAR), and sustainable pumping practices, are discussed to mitigate overextraction and contamination risks. The findings underscore the importance of an integrated approach combining geological and hydrological insights for effective groundwater governance. Collaboration between policymakers, hydrologists, and geologists is crucial to address the multifaceted challenges posed by changing environments. This paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge needed to safeguard groundwater resources for future generations while maintaining ecological balance.

References

  1. Falcone, P.M.; Imbert, E.; Sica, E.; Morone, P. Towards a bioenergy transition in Italy? Exploring regional stakeholder perspectives towards the Gela and Porto Marghera biorefineries. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 80, 102238.
  2. Doloi, H.K. Understanding stakeholders’ perspective of cost estimation in project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2011, 29, 622–636.
  3. Choudhury, S.; Pattnaik, S. Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from the stakeholders’ perspective. Comput. Educ. 2020, 144, 103657.
  4. Simeoni, U.; Corbau, C. A review of the Delta Po evolution (Italy) related to climatic changes and human impacts. Geomorphology 2009, 107, 64–71.
  5. Mollema, P.; Antonellini, M.; Gabbianelli, G.; Laghi, M.; Marconi, V.; Minchio, A. Climate and water budget change of a Mediterranean coastal watershed, Ravenna, Italy. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 65, 257–276.
  6. Ezquerro, P.; Tomás, R.; Béjar-Pizarro, M.; Fernández-Merodo, J.A.; Guardiola-Albert, C.; Staller, A.; Sánchez-Sobrino, J.A.; Herrera, G. Improving multi-technique monitoring using Sentinel-1 and Cosmo-SkyMed data and upgrading groundwater model capabilities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134757.
  7. Béjar-Pizarro, M.; Guardiola-Albert, C.; García-Cárdenas, R.P.; Herrera, G.; Barra, A.; López Molina, A.; Tessitore, S.; Staller, A.; Ortega-Becerril, J.A.; García-García, R.P. Interpolation of GPS and geological data using InSAR deformation maps: Method and application to land subsidence in the alto guadalentín aquifer (SE Spain). Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 965.
  8. Bonì, R.; Herrera, G.; Meisina, C.; Notti, D.; Béjar-Pizarro, M.; Zucca, F.; González, P.J.; Palano, M.; Tomás, R.; Fernánd, J.; et al. Twenty-year advanced DInSAR analysis of severe land subsidence: The Alto Guadalentín Basin (Spain) case study. Eng. Geol. 2015, 198, 40–52.
  9. Golden, H.E.; Sander, H.A.; Lane, C.R.; Zhao, C.; Price, K.; D’Amico, E.; Christensen, J.R. Relative effects of geographically isolated wetlands on streamflow: A watershed-scale analysis. Ecohydrology 2016, 9, 21–38.
  10. Singh, M.; Tandon, S.K.; Sinha, R. Assessment of connectivity in a water-stressed wetland (Kaabar Tal) of Kosi-Gandak interfan, north Bihar Plains, India. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf. 2017, 42, 1982–1996.
  11. Chai, J.C.; Shen, S.L.; Geng, X. Effect of initial water content and pore water chemistry on intrinsic compression behavior. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2019, 37, 417–423. [Green Version]
  12. Lin, S.S.; Shen, S.L.; Lyu, H.M.; Zhou, A. Assessment and management of lake eutrophication: A case study in Lake Erhai, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141618.
  13. Fatichi, S.; Rimkus, S.; Burlando, P.; Bordoy, R. Does internal climate variability overwhelm climate change signals in streamflow? The upper Po and Rhone basin case studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 493, 1171–1182.
  14. Lyu, H.M.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, A.; Zhou, W.H. Flood risk assessment of metro systems in a subsiding environment using the interval FAHP–FCA approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 50, 101682.
  15. Wu, M.; Hu, Y.; Wu, P.; He, P.; He, N.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, S.; Fang, S. Does soil pore water salinity or elevation influence vegetation spatial patterns along coasts? A case study of restored coastal wetlands in Nanhui, Shanghai. Wetlands 2020, 40, 2691–2700.
  16. Zhang, X.; Dong, Q.; Costa, V.; Wang, X. A hierarchical Bayesian model for decomposing the impacts of human activities and climate change on water resources in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 665, 836–847.
  17. Lin, S.S.; Shen, S.L.; Zou, A.; Zhang, N. Ensemble model for risk status evaluation of excavation system. Autom. Constr. 2021, 132, 103943.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. Ghanshyam Shakar "Geological and Hydrological Perspectives on Groundwater Management in Changing Environments" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp.874-883, March-April-2023.