Comparative Analysis of Energy-Saving Strategies and Throughput of SMR, MP-DSR, and ROAM

Authors

  • Kalu Ram Yadav  Research Scholar, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, India

Keywords:

MANET, ROAM, AODV, AOMDV, DSR, DUAL, DAG

Abstract

MANET is an auto-configuring, framework-less network of movable units connected through air. In a MANET, nodes communicate with each other without depending on a skeleton infrastructure such as central stations or access points. MANETs faces unique challenges like node mobility, limited power resources, and the need for efficient routing protocols. MANET requires adaptive routing algorithms to cope with changing network topologies and the absence of a fixed infrastructure. MANETs is suitable for the applications where setup of fixed infrastructure is impractical or expensive, such as army battlefield, rescue operations during natural disaster etc.Many on demand routing protocols for MANETs aim to establish and maintain efficient communication paths among mobile nodes have been designed in recent many years. Energy-efficient communication is essential to prolong the battery life of mobile nodes. We have been analysis three existing on demand multipath routing protocols (MP-DSR SMR and ROAM and) utilizing Network Simulator-2(NS-2). Here we analyzed above three protocols on Energy and throughput metrics parameters. We consider the network size 800mx800m in which nodes are randomly deployed. For simulation we use 25, 50 and 100 number of nodes. SMR exhibits a higher energy conservation rate, saving 4% more energy than ROAM and 8% more energy than MP-DSR in the presence of 25 nodes within the network. As the network expands to 50 nodes, MP-DSR outperforms ROAM by conserving 1.4% more energy and surpasses SMR by 2% in energy savings. In the context of 100 nodes, ROAM takes the lead in energy efficiency by preserving 4.5% more energy compared to MP-DSR and 5.5% more energy compared to SMR. These findings underscore the varied energy-saving capabilities of the protocols under different network sizes. Our simulation results also show that the throughput of ROAM is found to be superior to MP-DSR and SMR under different network sizes.

References

  1. C. Siva Ram and B.S.Manoj, Ad hoc wireless networks: Architectures and protocols, Pearson Education, 2005.
  2. “Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) Working Group Charter”,
  3. C.K.Toh, “Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Protocols and Systems”, Prentice hall PTR,New Jersey,USA,2002.
  4. M.S.Obaidat and S.Mishra,”Principle of wireless Sensor Networks”, Cambridge University Press, U.K. ,2015.
  5. D. B. Johnson, "Routing in Ad Hoc Networks of Mobile Hosts," 1994 First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Cruz, California,USA, 1994, pp. 158-163, doi: 10.1109/WMCSA.1994.33.
  6. Mohammed Tarique , Kemal E. Tepe , Sasan Adibi , Shervin Erfani ,” Survey of multipath routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 32 (2009) 1125–1143.
  7. Azzedine Boukerche , Begumhan Turgut , Nevin Aydin , Mohammad Z. Ahmad ,Ladislau Bölöni , Damla Turgut ,” Routing protocols in ad hoc networks: A survey”,Computer Networks 55 (2011) 3032–3080.
  8. Elizabeth M. Royer, Santa Barbara, Chai-Keong Toh, "AReviewof Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks" 1070-9916/99/ IEEE Personal Communications, April 1999.
  9. E. Alotaibi and B. Mukherjee, “A Survey on Routing Algorithms for wireless Ad-Hoc and mesh networks,” Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 940–965,October 2011.
  10. S. Lee and M. Gerla, "Split multipath routing with maximally disjoint paths in ad hoc networks," ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications.Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240), Helsinki, Finland, 2001, pp. 3201-3205 vol.10, doi: 10.1109/ICC.2001.937262.
  11. R. Leung, Jilei Liu, E. Poon, A.C. Chan and Baochun Li, "MP-DSR: “A QoS-aware multi-path dynamic source routing protocol for wireless ad-hoc networks," Proceedings LCN 2001. 26th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks,Tampa, FL, USA, 2001, pp. 132-141, doi: 10.1109/LCN.2001.990778.
  12. Raju, Jyoti & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J.,”A new approach to on-demand loop-free multipath routing” 1999, 522 - 527. 10.1109/ICCCN.1999.805568.
  13. Network Simulator ns-2: Documentation, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/nsdocumentation.
  14. Shalini Puri,Dr. Satish.R.Devene “Congestion Avoidance and Load Balancing in AODV-Multipath using Queue Length” Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, ICETET-09(2009).
  15. B.Malarkodi, P.Rakesh and B.Venkataramani “PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ON-DEMAND MUTIPATH DISTANCE VECTOR ROUTING PROTOCOL UNDER DIFFERENT TRAFFIC MODELS” International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing(2009)

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Downloads

Published

2017-04-30

Issue

Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April-2017

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRSET

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Kalu Ram Yadav, " Comparative Analysis of Energy-Saving Strategies and Throughput of SMR, MP-DSR, and ROAM, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp.1008-1015, March-April-2017.