Comparison of Efficiency of Solar Water Heater Using Different Nanofluids In CFD

Authors

  • Shailesh Kumar  TIT&S, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Dr. Ankit Goyal  R.G.P.V., Gandhi Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Prof. Priyavrat Kumar  
  • Dr. Vikas Gupta  

Keywords:

Fossil Fuel, Nano fluid, Nano particles, Solar collector, Solar energy

Abstract

Since the industrial revolution, fossil fuel has been the main resource for generating power and energy. However, with an increase in environmental awareness, people realized the huge negative impact of fossil fuel burning on Earth. Consequently, the concept of renewable energy emerged, and the field of renewable energy has seen an increasing number of researchers devote effort to solving the energy crisis facing humanity. Among all the renewable energy sources, solar energy plays one of the important role in the development of industry. This study on workbench 2021R1 was used to model nanofluid flow and heat transfer in the tube of a flat plate solar collector. The flow in the tube is laminar. Two types of nanoparticles, i.e., Al2O3 and CuO, with three different volume concentrations, i.e., 0%, 0.5%, and 1% in water, were chosen for comparison purposes. The inlet temperature of the fluid was assumed to be uniform at the room temperature of 300K. In this thesis, the results of a simulation are discussed on outlet temperature, efficiency. The outlet temperature of the nanofluid was greater than that of pure water, and the difference increased with the volume concentration of the nanoparticles. Furthermore, the water-based CuO nanofluid has better performance than the water-based Al2O3 nanofluid. The efficiency of the solar collector did not increase when nanoparticles were added, owing to limitations of the model; an example of a limitation is that solar energy absorption by nanoparticles was not considered in the model.

References

  1. Choi, S.U. and Eastman, J.A., 1995. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles (No. ANL/MSD/CP-84938; CONF-951135-29). Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States).
  2. Yousefi, T., Veysi, F., Shojaeizadeh, E. and Zinadini, S., 2012. An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2O3–H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renewable Energy, 39(1), pp.293-298.
  3. Said, Z., Sajid, M.H., Alim, M.A., Saidur, R. and Rahim, N.A., 2013. Experimental investigation of the thermophysical properties of AL2O3-nanofluid and its effect on a flat plate solar collector. International communications in heat and mass transfer, 48, pp.99-107.
  4. Moghadam, A.J., Farzane-Gord, M., Sajadi, M. and Hoseyn-Zadeh, M., 2014. Effects of CuO/water nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 58, pp.9-14.
  5. Meibodi, S.S., Kianifar, A., Niazmand, H., Mahian, O. and Wongwises, S., 2015. Experimental investigation on the thermal efficiency and performance characteristics of a flat plate solar collector using SiO2/EG–water nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 65, pp.71-75.
  6. He, Q., Zeng, S. and Wang, S., 2015. Experimental investigation on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors with nanofluids. Applied Thermal Engineering, 88, pp.165-171.
  7. Faizal, M., Saidur, R., Mekhilef, S., Hepbasli, A. and Mahbubul, I.M., 2015. Energy, economic, and environmental analysis of a flat-plate solar collector operated with SiO2 nanofluid. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(6), pp.1457- 1473.
  8. Verma, S.K., Tiwari, A.K. and Chauhan, D.S., 2016. Performance augmentation in flat plate solar collector using MgO/water nanofluid. Energy conversion and management, 124, pp.607-617.
  9. Ziyadanogullari, N.B., Yucel, H.L. and Yildiz, C., 2018. Thermal performance enhancement of flat-plate solar collectors by means of three different nanofluids. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 8, pp.55-65.
  10. Mirzaei, M., Hosseini, S.M.S. and Kashkooli, A.M.M., 2018. Assessment of Al2O3 nanoparticles for the optimal operation of the flat plate solar collector. Applied Thermal Engineering, 134, pp.68-77.
  11. Tong, Y., Lee, H., Kang, W. and Cho, H., 2019. Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al2O3 nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid. Applied Thermal Engineering, 159, p.113959.
  12. Mousavi, S.M., Esmaeilzadeh, F. and Wang, X.P., 2019. A detailed investigation on the thermo-physical and rheological behavior of MgO/TiO2 aqueous dual hybrid nanofluid. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 282, pp.323-339.
  13. Sundar, L.S., Misganaw, A.H., Singh, M.K., Pereira, A.M. and Sousa, A.C., 2020. Efficiency, energy and economic analysis of twisted tape inserts in a thermosyphon solar flat plate collector with Cu nanofluids. Renewable Energy Focus, 35, pp.10-31.
  14. Gupta, S., Rajale, S., Raval, F., Sojitra, M., Tiwari, A.K., Joshi, A. and Singh, R., 2021. Comparative performance analysis of flat plate solar collectors with and without aluminium oxide-based nano-fluid. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, pp.5378-5383.
  15. Alwan, N.T., Shcheklein, S.E. and Ali, O.M., 2021. Experimental analysis of thermal performance for flat plate solar water collector in the climate conditions of Yekaterinburg, Russia. Materials Today: Proceedings, 42, pp.2076-2083.
  16. Singh, G., Singh, D.B., Kumar, S., Bharti, K. and Chhabra, S., 2021. A review of inclusion of nanofluids on the attainment of different types of solar collectors. Materials Today: Proceedings, 38, pp.153-159.
  17. Kumar, R., Verma, S.K. and Singh, M., 2022. Performance evaluation of cerium oxide/water nanofluid based FPSC: An experimental analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, pp.1659-1667.
  18. Nasrin, R. and Alim, M.A., 2014. Finite Element Simulation of Forced Convection in a Flat Plate Solar Collector: Influence of Nanofluid with Double Nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 7(3).
  19. Administration, U.S.E.I. What is U.S. electricity generation by energy source? 2019; Available from: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3.
  20. https://powermin.gov.in/en/content/power-sector-glance-all-india
  21. Choi, S.U. and J.A. Eastman, Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. 1995, Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). www.wikipidia.com

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Shailesh Kumar, Dr. Ankit Goyal, Prof. Priyavrat Kumar, Dr. Vikas Gupta "Comparison of Efficiency of Solar Water Heater Using Different Nanofluids In CFD" International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp.200-208, January-February-2024.