Advanced Real Time Bone Fracture Monitoring with Pain Control Mechanism

Logasundari.T; Gopika.TP; Swathe. L; Saathvika. R

doi:10.32628/IJSRSET2411280

Authors

Logasundari.T Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Gopika.TP UG Scholar, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Swathe. L UG Scholar, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Saathvika. R UG Scholar, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2411280

Keywords:

TEG, GSR Sensor, MEMS Sensor, Ultrasound Sensor

Abstract

Bones provide structural aid to the frame, and bone fracture recuperation is crucial for regaining functionality and mobility. The boundaries of traditional external fixators in bone fracture remedy, characterized by a loss of actual-time monitoring and capability complications, necessitate a paradigm shift. To clear up this trouble, a clever fixator design imbued with the transformative energy of Aware, Sensing, Smart, and Active (ASSA) technology has been developed. This fixator transcends its passive role, evolving into a wise IoT gateway. It continuously gathers and analyses facts from numerous incorporated sensors, supplying real-time insights into the tricky dance of fracture healing. Its analytical prowess fosters computerized identification of vital activities and milestones within the affected person's recuperation journey, empowering well-timed interventions and knowledgeable scientific selection-making. Furthermore, the fixator vigilantly monitors patient compliance, making sure adherence to prescribed behaviours and nipping non-compliance in the bud. However, its innovation extends beyond mere monitoring. Embedded within its smart framework lies a modern pain manipulation mechanism powered through a thermoelectric generator (TEG).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mišić, Dragan, et al. "Real-time monitoring of bone fracture recovery by using aware, sensing, smart, and active orthopedic devices." IEEE Internet of Things Journal 5.6 (2018): 4466-4473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2819623

Merle, Géraldine, et al. "Sensor technology usage in orthopedic trauma." Injury (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.036

Islam, SM Riazul, et al. "The internet of things for health care: a comprehensive survey." IEEE access 3 (2015): 678-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951

Shoaib, Muhammad, et al. "Fusion of smartphone motion sensors for physical activity recognition." Sensors 14.6 (2014): 10146-10176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s140610146

Lee, Doojin, George Shaker, and Robin Augustine. "Preliminary study: Monitoring of healing stages of bone fracture utilizing uwb pulsed radar technique." 2018 18th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM). IEEE, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTEM.2018.8572872

Lestari, Gita Rindang, and Tomy Abuzairi. "Design of portable galvanic skin response sensor for pain sensor." 2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA). IEEE, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570614094

Hasan, Nor Sham, et al. "Development of new smart heat therapy." 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. IEEE,2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IECBES.2012.6498070

Mahmud, Md Anam, et al. "A complete internet of things (IoT) platform forstructural health monitoring (shm)." 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). IEEE, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT.2018.8355094

Zdravković, Milan, et al. "Towards the Internet-of-Things platform for orthopaedics surgery—The smart external fixation device case studies." Proceedings of the I-ESA Workshop B4 Sens. EnterpriseOpportunities Barriers. 2016.

Banos, Oresti, et al. "Window size impact in human activity recognition." Sensors 14.4 (2014): 6474-6499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s140406474

Labrador, Miguel A., and Oscar D. Lara Yejas. Human activity recognition: Using wearable sensors and smartphones. CRC Press, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b16098

Wachs, Rebecca A., et al. "Elementary implantable force sensor: for smartorthopaedic implants." Advances in biosensors and bioelectronics 2.4 (2013).

Webster, Thomas J., ed. Nanotechnology enabled in situ sensors for monitoring health. Vol. 68. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7291-0

Yoshida, Takashi, et al. "Measurement of bone electrical impedance in fracture healing." Journal of orthopaedic science 14 (2009): 320-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1333-z

Parvizi, Javad, et al. "Selfprotective smart orthopedic implants." Expert Review of Medical Devices 4.1 (2007): 55-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.4.1.55