Networking in Cloud Computing: Embracing Contests and Seizing Prospects

Yasodha K; M. Shabitha  Sree; Krishna Sri. S; Kirubha Shakthi. J; Karthick. K; Kanishka. N

doi:10.32628/IJSRSET241138

Authors

Yasodha K Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Excel Engineering College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India Author
M. Shabitha Sree Department of Computer Applications, Excel Engineering College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Krishna Sri. S Department of Computer Applications, Excel Engineering College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Kirubha Shakthi. J Department of Computer Applications, Excel Engineering College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Karthick. K Department of Computer Applications, Excel Engineering College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Kanishka. N Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Excel Engineering College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET241138

Keywords:

Infrastructure As A Service, Software-Defined Networking, Cloud Computing

Abstract

Cloud computing presents the concept of utility computing, which allows users to access computing, storage, and networking resources as needed, with a usage-based pricing model. However, consumers have limited control over network resources, and cloud-computing providers confront a number of issues when operating infrastructure as a service (IaaS) environments. This research investigates the networking difficulties and federation challenges inherent in IaaS, as well as unique software-defined networking (SDN) concepts that could provide efficient solutions for future deployments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing,” September 2011: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800- 145.pdf, accessed 30November 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145

T. Koponen , M. Casado , N. Gude , J. Stribling , L. Poutievski , M. Zhu , R. Ramanathan , Y. Iwata , H. Inoue , T. Hama , S. Shenker, “Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large- scale Production Networks”, in Proc. OSDI, 2010.

R. Niranjan Mysore, A. Pamboris, N. Farrington, N. Huang, P. Miri, S. Radhakrishnan, V. Subramanya, A. Vahdat, “PortLand: A Scalable Fault-Tolerant Layer 2 Data Center Network Fabric,” ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Communi., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 39-50, October 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1594977.1592575

C. J. Sher Decusatis, A. Carranza, C. M. Decusatis, "Communication within clouds: open standards and proprietary protocols for data center networking," Communications Magazine, IEEE , vol.50, no.9, pp.26-33, September 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2012.6295708

T. Wood, P. Shenoy, K. K. Ramakrishnan, J. Von der Merwe, “CloudNet: A Platform for Optimized WAN migration of Virtual Machines,” Technical Report 2010-002, University of Massachusetts, http://people.cs.umass.edu/~twood/pubs/cloudnet-tr.pdf, accessed 30 November 2012.

N. McKeowen, et. al, “OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks”, OpenFlow white paper, 14 March 2008, available online:http://www.openflow.org//documents/openflow-wp-latest.pdf, accessed 30 November 2012.

OpenFlow Switch Specifiation, version 1.3.1 (wire protocol 0x04), Open Networking Foundation, 6 September 2012, https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/s pecification/openflow- spec-v1.3 1.pdf, access: 30 November 2012.

Open vSwitch, An Open Virtual Switch: http://openvswitch.org/

B. Pfaff, B. Davie, “The Open vSwitch Database Management Protocol,” Internet-draft, draft-pfaff-ovsdb-proto- 00, Nicira Inc., 20 August 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc7047

S. Azodolmolky, R. Nejabati, S. Peng, A. Hammad, M. P. Channegowda, N. Efstathiou, A. Autenrieth, P. Kaczmarek, and D. Simeonidou, “Optical FlowVisor: An OpenFlow- based optical network virtualization approach,” In proceedings of OFC/NFOEC 2012, paper JTh2A.41, 4-8 March 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/NFOEC.2012.JTh2A.41