A Trustworthy AI and Data Governance Architecture for Ensuring Integrity and Ethics in Large Language Model Deployments across Enterprise Platforms

Authors

  • Minjun Park AI Governance Architect Author
  • Hiroshi Tanaka Enterprise Data Security Engineer Author
  • Wei Chen Responsible AI Systems Researcher Author
  • Jaehoon Kim Cloud and Platform Reliability Architect Author
  • Ananya Kulkarni Research Associate Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET242437

Keywords:

Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models, Enterprise AI Governance, Data Governance Architecture, Responsible AI, Model Integrity, Ethical AI Compliance, AI Risk Management, Explainable AI, Model Observability, Privacy by Design, Human-in-the-Loop Oversight, Auditability and Traceability, Secure AI Deployment, Regulatory Compliance Frameworks

Abstract

The rapid enterprise adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed knowledge work, decision support, and digital service delivery, yet their deployment introduces substantial risks related to data integrity, privacy exposure, algorithmic bias, hallucinated outputs, and unclear accountability across organizational boundaries. Traditional data governance and information security models were not designed to manage probabilistic, generative systems whose behaviors evolve dynamically with context, prompting the need for a new class of trustworthy AI governance mechanisms. This paper proposes a comprehensive Trustworthy AI and Data Governance Architecture that embeds integrity, ethics, and compliance controls directly into the lifecycle of enterprise LLM deployments, spanning data acquisition, model training, fine-tuning, retrieval augmentation, prompt orchestration, inference monitoring, and post-deployment auditing. The framework integrates policy-driven guardrails, lineage tracking, explainability checkpoints, human-in-the-loop oversight, and continuous risk evaluation to ensure traceability and responsible decision making. Control layers are aligned with emerging guidance from National Institute of Standards and Technology risk management principles and regulatory expectations established by the European Commission AI governance initiatives, enabling measurable assurance of fairness, reliability, and accountability. Through a design-science methodology and enterprise reference scenarios, the architecture demonstrates how organizations can operationalize ethical AI practices without sacrificing scalability or performance. The proposed model advances governance-by-design, transforming trust from an abstract principle into enforceable technical and procedural controls, thereby enabling safe, compliant, and sustainable LLM adoption across complex enterprise platforms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barlaug, N., & Gulla, J. A. (2021). Neural networks for entity matching: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(11), Article 233. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442200

Binette, O., & Steorts, R. C. (2022). (Almost) all of entity resolution. Science Advances, 8(12), eabi8021. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi8021

Nanchari, N. (2022). Data Privacy And Security Challenges In Iot Healthcare. In International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends (Vol. 8, Number 6). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15796381

Routhu, K. K. (2023). AI-driven skills forecasting in Oracle HCM Cloud: From static competencies to predictive workforce design. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17292267

Thota, M. R. (2021). Cognitive workload placement models: Integrating AI analytics for cost efficient and resilient cloud operations. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 8(6), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17839006

Parasa, M. (2019). Policy-centric AI control architectures for enterprise software platforms: A governance framework for SAP SuccessFactors. International Journal of Core Engineering and Management, 6(5), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17948338

Menda, J. R. (2019). A distributed identity orchestration framework for secure authentication automation leveraging Keycloak, OAuth 2.0 grant types, and adaptive access policies. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 5(4), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT192144

Vankayala, S. C. (2022). Consumer driven contract testing: A foundation for reliable, high velocity microservices delivery. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17896052

Sudhir Vishnubhatla. (2023). Towards Autonomous Multi-Cloud Data Orchestration: Challenges and Future Directions. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 10(11), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17840117

Padur, S. K. R. (2018). Autonomous cloud economics: AI driven right sizing and cost optimization in hybrid infrastructures. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 4(5), 2090–2097.

Nithin Nanchari. (2020). The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Healthcare. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 67–69. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15968914

Menda, J. R. (2021). Building resilient and compliance driven observability architectures for modern BFSI enterprises using unified monitoring, telemetry correlation, and proactive incident intelligence. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18107872

Routhu, K. K. (2019). Conversational AI in human capital management: Transforming self service experiences with Oracle Digital Assistant. International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17678011

Vankayala, S. C. (2020). Advancing DevOps quality through containerization and Kubernetes orchestration. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18014095

Parasa, M. (2021). Bias-Aware Algorithm Design for Workforce Decisions: Embedding Ethical AI Controls in SAP SuccessFactors. International Journal of Core Engineering & Management, 6(12), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17948186

Thota, M. R. (2019). Advancing mission critical data platforms through predictive observability and autonomous diagnostics. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18083069

Sudhir Vishnubhatla. (2022). AI-Enabled Interoperability and Cloud Orchestration: Redefining Healthcare Information Management for a Connected Ecosystem. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 9(6), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17639040

Padur, S. K. R. (2019). Machine learning for predictive capacity planning: Evolution from analytical modeling to autonomous infrastructure. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 5(5), 285–293.

Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2021). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386

Schlichtkrull, M., Kipf, T. N., Bloem, P., Van Den Berg, R., Titov, I., & Welling, M. (2018). Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In The Semantic Web ESWC 2018 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10843, pp. 593–607). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_38

Downloads

Published

18-08-2024

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Minjun Park, Hiroshi Tanaka, Wei Chen, Jaehoon Kim, and Ananya Kulkarni, “A Trustworthy AI and Data Governance Architecture for Ensuring Integrity and Ethics in Large Language Model Deployments across Enterprise Platforms”, Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 508–521, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.32628/IJSRSET242437.