Risk Assessment of Aging G+3 Residential Buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET25122165Keywords:
Ageing Buildings, Building Safety, NDT- Non-destructive tests, UPV- Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, Post-Repair EvaluationAbstract
The structural deterioration of ageing buildings in India presents significant safety hazards, necessitating systematic assessment and intervention measures. This study examines the efficacy of structural audits in evaluating and enhancing the stability of older buildings. The audit methodology encompasses comprehensive visual inspections and advanced non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques, including Rebound hammer tests, Ultrasonic pulse velocity tests, Carbonation tests, and Half-cell potential tests, to assess structural integrity. The overall health of Buildings based on visual inspection concludes that in the context of Mumbai's Building and Construction Authority (BMC) classification of dilapidated buildings, Raj Laxman A1-B1 & A2-B2 Society falls under the C2B category (requires structural repairs but does not necessitate immediate evacuation of residents) On performing Rebound Hammer Test, it is found that Building A1-B1,17% of total Structural Elements Tested are comes under the fair condition while 83% of them are falls under poor Category and Building A2-B2,8% of total Structural Elements Tested are comes under the fair condition while 92% of them are falls under poor Category of Condition. On performing the UPV Test, it was found that all the tested elements fall under the medium category. Conducted Carbonation test results show that both Buildings A1-B1 and A2-B2 have no carbonation or a negligible depth of carbonation in the concrete. The probability of corrosion in the reinforcement of both Buildings A1-B1 and A2-B2 was approximately 70% as corrosion activity fell between 200mV & 350mV. Audit and Stability reports of both Buildings A1-B1 and A2-B2 prepared on the Visual inspections and NDT findings. Following the repair of the building, on performing Rebound Hammer Test it is found that Building A1-B1,50% of total Structural Elements Tested are comes under the good condition while 50% of them are falls under fair Category and Building A2-B2,60% of total Structural Elements Tested are comes under the good condition while 40% of them are falls under fair Category of Condition. The condition of the building was enhanced after taking up repair work, as suggested.
Downloads
References
Agarakar, E., Khobragade, P.R., n.d. A Review Article on “Structural Audit and Rehabilitation of Old Building in BDCE Campus.”
Argade, A., Motegaonkar, S.S., 2022. Structural Audit of Building: A Structural Health Analysis of Building 09.
Belkade, A., Gupta, A., Ingle, N., Kamble, P., Suryawanshi, V., 2019. Understanding the Structural Audit 06.
Berde, V.S., Mulay, D.S.B., 2021. “STRUCTURAL AUDIT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING- SAINATH APARTMENT, VIRAR 8.
Gund, P., Nalawade, S., 2019. A Review on Structural Audit, Repair and Rehabilitation of Building 8.
Kondalkar, R., Pitale, N.H., Dabhekar, K.R., Mase, D.P., 2021. “Structural Audit of an Old Building” (A Case Study). IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1197, 012054.
Lipte, P., Galatage, A., 2020. Structural Audit, Repair and Rehabilitation Techniques 07.
Mahadik, A.B., Jaiswal, M.H., n.d. Structural Audit of Buildings.
Mahadik, A.B., Jaiswal, M.H., n.d. Structural Audit of Buildings.
Naik, S.L., Saunshi, B., n.d. STRUCTURAL AUDIT OF RCC BUILDING 04.
Newell, R., Sartape, Y., Ramane, A., Telrandhe, S., Vairal, S., Joshi, G., n.d. Structural Audit, Repair and Rehabilitation of Building 6.
Pandharipande, P.P., Badar, D.A.M., Satone, D.S.R., 2022. “STRUCTURAL AUDIT OF AN EDUCATIONAL BUILDING.”(A CASE STUDY) 9.
Raut, A., Pitale, N.H., Mase, D.D.P., 2019. Structural Audit of 30-Year-Old Building with Structural Strengthening 06.
Sadamate, J.M., n.d. Structural Auditing with a Case Study.
Kamal kant Jain, Bishwajit Bhattacharjee "VisualInspection and Condition assessment of structure: Aninnovative tool for structural condition assessment "(ResearchGate, International Journal of three R's Jan 2019 )1
Douglas E Ellsworth, Keith Ginnado "Guide for Visual Inspection of Structural Concrete Building" (US Army Corps of Engineering Construction engineering research laboratory July 2017) 2
Maria Valeria Piras, Fausto Mistretta, Luisa Deias, "A reliable visual inspection method for vulnerability assessment of hypostatic structure" (Research Article, Journal of construction Engineering, 2015)3
Jorge Furtado Falorca, Joao P. N. D, Miraldes. "New Trends in visual inspection of buildings and structures" Research Article, Open Engineering, ResearchGate Journal, 2021 4
Ni Nyoman Kencanawati , "The study of ultrasonic pulse velocity on plain and reinforced damaged concrete The study of ultrasonic pulse velocity on plain and reinforced damaged concrete "( MATEC Web of Conferences 195, CRMCE 2018, ResearchGate Journal)5
A Ndagi, A Umar, "Non-destructive assessment of concrete deterioration by ultrasonic pulse velocity "(To cite this article: A Ndagi et al.. 2019 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 357 012015 )6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.