Optimization Approach for Crashworthiness of Vehicles Based on Physically Defined Equivalent Static Loads for a new Topology

Authors

  • Suhail Ahmad Khan  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sagar Institutes of Science & Technology, (SISTec), Bhopal, RGTU University, Bhopal, India
  • Mousam Sharma  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sagar Institutes of Science & Technology, (SISTec), Bhopal, RGTU University, Bhopal, India

Keywords:

Crashworthiness, Topology Optimization, Equivalent Static Forces, Simplified Crash Modeling

Abstract

Optimization Approach for Crashworthiness of Vehicles Based on Physically Defined Equivalent Static Loads for a new topology. The new method is based on principle energy considerations inspired from the current design process in modern automotive product development. The potential of the vehicle concept to absorb kinetic energy can be estimated at the very beginning of the design process by the free crash lengths in the different areas of the vehicle and estimates of average forces required in the specific parts of the car body at particular crash phases. Here it is important to determine appropriate force distributions and the corresponding load paths through the whole structure for all relevant crash load case. Depending on the vehicle type, a knowledge base is derived for the spatial and temporal distribution of force levels, which is then used in a temporal sequence of static topology optimizations. Standard topology optimization methods based on linear finite element methods are used in a time sequence where the loads are applied for certain time periods in special areas of the package assigned to the structure for different phases of the crash. For this it was necessary to derive distinct deformation phases characteristic for each crash load case and corresponding equivalent static loads, which reflect the actual transfer of loads through the structure.

References

  1. Kang BS, Choi WS, and Park GJ: Structural optimization under equivalent static loads transformed from dynamic loads based on displacement. Comput Struct 79:145-154, 2015.
  2. Choi WS and Park GJ: Structural optimization using equivalent static loads at all time intervals. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 191:2077-2094, 2014.
  3. Park G-J: Equivalent Static Loads Method for Non Linear Static Response Structural Optimization. Proc 9th LS-DYNA Forum, Bamberg, Germany, 2013.
  4. Park, G-J: Technical overview of the equivalent static loads method for non-linear static response structural optimization Struct Multidisc Optim 43:319-337, 2013.
  5. Shin MK, Park KJ and Park G-J: Optimization of Structures with Nonlinear Behavior Using Equivalent Loads. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 196: 1154-1167, 2012.
  6. Kim Y-I and Park G-J: Nonlinear dynamic response structural optimization using equivalent static loads. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 199(912):660-676, 2010.
  7. Dietrich T: sthesis, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, to be submitted 2013.
  8. Idrees SA: Application of Structural Optimization based in Non-linear Explicit Responses Using Equivalent Static Load Method. MSc thesis, FG Computational Mechanics, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, 2010.
  9. Patel NM: Crashworthiness design using topology optimization. MTECh thesis, Univ of Notre Dame, IN, USA, 2007.
  10. Patel NM, Kang B-S, Renaud JE and Tovar A: Crashworthiness Design Using Topology Optimization. ASME - J Mech Design 131, 2009.
  11. Sigmund O: On the usefulness of non-gradient approaches in topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 43:589-596, 2011.
  12. Duddeck F: Survey on Robust Design and Optimisation for Crashworthiness. In: Duddeck F, Bletzinger K-U, Bucher C, Matthies H and Meyer M (eds.): Proc EUROMECH Colloquium 482 Efficient Methods for Robust Design and Optimisation, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK, 2007.
  13. Jones N: Structural Impact. Cambridge University press, paperback edition, 1997.
  14. Abramowicz W: Macro Element Method in Crashworthiness. In: Ambrosio J (ed.): Crashworthiness - Energy Management and Occupant Protection. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Springer, Udine, Italy, 2001.
  15. Lu G and Yu T: Energy absorption of structures and materials. Woodhead Publ. Ltd., Cambridge, UK, 2003.
  16. Gea HC and Luo J: Design for energy absorption: a topology optimization approach. ASME DETC2001/DAC21060, 2001.
  17. Jung D and Gea HC: Design of an energy-absorbing structure using topology optimization with a multimaterial model. Struct Multidisc Optim 32:251-257, 2006.
  18. Mozumder CK: Topometry optimization of sheet metal structures for crashworthiness design using hybrid cellular automata. thesis, Univ of Notre Dame, IN, USA, 2010.
  19. Hunkeler S, Rayamajhi M, Zimmer H and Duddeck F: New Topology Optimization Method for Crashworthiness Design using Hybrid Cellular Automata. Proc 10th World Congr Comput Mech (WCCM 2012), Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2012.
  20. Reed C: Applications of OptiStruct Optimization to Body-in-White Design. Proc 7th Altair CAE Technology Conf, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Suhail Ahmad Khan, Mousam Sharma, " Optimization Approach for Crashworthiness of Vehicles Based on Physically Defined Equivalent Static Loads for a new Topology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp.162-169, May-June-2017.