Partial Least Squares in Constructing Candidates Model Averaging

Authors

  • Muhammad Arna Ramadhan  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Bagus Sartono  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Anang Kurnia  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

Keywords:

Model Averaging, Partial Least Squares, High-Dimensional Regression

Abstract

Model averaging has been developed as an alternative method in regression analysis when number of observations is smaller than number of explanatory variables (also known as high-dimensional regression). Main concept about this method is weighted average of several candidate models, in order to improve prediction accuracy. There are two steps in model averaging: construct several candidate models and determine weights for candidate models. Our research proposed partial least squares model averaging (PLSMA) as an approach to construct candidate models, while partial least squares (PLS) method was applied during that process to reduce and transform original explanatory variables become new variables that called components. The evaluation of PLSMA is conducted by measured Root Mean Squared Error of Prediction (RMSEP) with simulation data. Compared to other methods, PLSMA has given the smallest RMSEP, so this result indicates that this method had yielded more accurate prediction than other existing methods.

References

  1. Naes T., Isakson T., Fearn T., and Davies T. 2002. A user-friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification, NIR Publications, Chicester.
  2. Hansen, B. E. 2007. Least squares model averaging. Econometrica, 75(4), 1175-1189.
  3. Perrone, M. P. 1993. Improving regression estimation: Averaging methods for variance reduction with extensions to general convex measure optimization (Doctoral dissertation, Brown University).
  4. Ando, T. and Li, K. C. 2014. A model-averaging approach for high-dimensional regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109(505), 254-265.
  5. Wang, H., Zhang, X., and Zou, G. 2009. Frequentist model averaging estimation: a review. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 22(4), 732.
  6. Moral-Benito, E. 2015. Model averaging in economics: An overview. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 46-75.
  7. Salaki, D. T., Kurnia, A., and Sartono, B. 2016. Model averaging method for supersaturated experimental design. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (vol. 31, no. 1, p. 012016). IOP Publishing.
  8. Rahardiantoro, S., Sartono, B., and Kurnia, A. 2017, March. Model averaging for predicting the exposure to aflatoxin B1 using DNA methylation in white blood cells of infants. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: (vol. 58, no. 1, p. 012019). IOP Publishing.
  9. Posada, D., and Buckley, T. R. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic biology, 53(5), 793-808.
  10. Dunn, W. J., Scott, D. R., and Glen, W. G. 1989. Principal components analysis and partial least squares regression. Tetrahedron Computer Methodology, 2(6), 349-376.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-28

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Muhammad Arna Ramadhan, Bagus Sartono, Anang Kurnia, " Partial Least Squares in Constructing Candidates Model Averaging, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp.1459-1463, January-February-2018.