A Study to Estimate Head Count Index in Small Areas with M-quantile Regression Model Case Study : Poverty in Bogor District Year 2015

Authors

  • Zahra Fadhila  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Kusman Sadik  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Indahwati  Department of Statistics, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/IJSRSET21841128

Keywords:

Monte Carlo simulation, M-quantile Modeling, Head Count Index, Outliers, Random Effect.

Abstract

Poverty should be overcome with data. Problem arises when poverty is identified in sub-distric level, yet the data are in district level. Alternatively, M-quantile regression modeling in small area estimation as an indirect estimation approach can be done to measure poverty level in sub-district region with the use of district-scaled or even province-scaled data. In this paper, a Monte Carlo simulation will be conducted to empirically evaluate M-quantile modeling which contaminated area random effect and individual random effect to estimate head count index. M-quantile modeling is chosen because it is quantile-based semiparametric method which guarantees statistical estimation to be robust. Both direct and indirect estimations are performed and the the results of both estimations will be compared in each scenarios. The goodness of fit will be measured with bias and root mean squared error (RMSE). The result shows that M-quantile modeling is effective when there are outliers in individual random effect. Finally, results of application of M-quantile regression modeling to National Socio-economic Survey in Indonesia are presented.

References

  1. Administrator. (2018, November 18). Garis Kemiskinan dan Penduduk Miskin di Kabupaten Bogor, 2010-2015. Retrieved from https://bogorkab.bps.go.id/
  2. Yusuf, Asyari. (2018, November 13). Tingkat Kemiskinan Kabupaten Bogor Masih Tinggi. Retrieved from https://www.jawapos.com/jpg-today/.
  3. Chambers RL, Tzavidis N. 2006. Biometrika, 93, 255-268. M-Quantile Models for Small Area Estimation.
  4. Elbers C, Lanjouw JO, Lanjouw P. 2003. Econometrica, 71, 355-364. Micro-level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality.
  5. Girinoto, Sadik K, Indahwati. 2017. American Institute of Physics, 020032 Robust Small Area Estimation of Poverty Indicators Using M-quantile Approach (Case Study: Sub-district Level in Bogor District).
  6. Huber. 2009. Robust Statistics, Second Edition. New Jersey (USA): Wiley Publications.
  7. Marchetti S, Tzavidis N, Pratesi M. 2012. Computional Statistics & Data Analysis, 56(10), 2889-2902. Non-parametric Bootstrap Mean Squared Error Estimation for M-quantile Estimators of Small Area Averages, Quantiles and Poverty Indicators.
  8. Molina I, Rao JNK. 2010. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 38, 369-385. Small Area Estimation of Poverty Indicators.
  9. Tzavidis N, Brown JJ. 2010. [Working Paper No.10-11]. London (UK): University of London. Using M-quantile Models as an Alternative to Random Effects to Model The Contextual Value-added of Schools in London.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Zahra Fadhila, Kusman Sadik, Indahwati, " A Study to Estimate Head Count Index in Small Areas with M-quantile Regression Model Case Study : Poverty in Bogor District Year 2015 , International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), Print ISSN : 2395-1990, Online ISSN : 2394-4099, Volume 4, Issue 11, pp.239-247, November-December-2018. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET21841128