Time Series Earthquake Prediction Model
Keywords:
Earthquake, Flutter, Adaboost, Random Forest, Classifier.Abstract
Natural calamities like earthquake cause damage to life and property. Assessment of harm grade to structures is fundamental for post-disaster reaction and recuperation end of the monotonous course of manual approval and confirmation of property harm prior to giving alleviation assets to individuals. By taking into account essential perspectives like structure area, age of the building, development subtleties and it's auxiliary purposes, taken from the Gorkha seismic tremor dataset, this paper investigates different multi-class grouping AI models and procedures for anticipating the harm grade of designs. The proposed engineering of the model includes three significant stages, Component Choice, genetic algorithm adaboost Randomforest Classifier, and adaboost decision tree Classifier. and adaboost decision tree Classifier. The paper gives the after effects of the analyses highlight designing, preparing varieties and gathering learning. The paper dives into the examination of each model, to figure out the explanation for their presentation. This paper likewise gathers the specialists that play a significant job in choosing the earthquake damage of the structures. The proposed classifier in the paper gives critical contribution to understanding earthquake damage and also provides a paradigm to model other natural disaster damage.
References
- Andrews, D. F. A robust method for multiple linear regression. Technometrics 16, 4 (1974), 523–531.
- Asim, K., Mart´?nez-´Alvarez, F., Basit, A., and Iqbal, T. Earthquake magnitude prediction in hindukush region using machine learning techniques. Natural Hazards 85 (01 2017), 471–486.
- Bhandarkar, T., K, V., Satish, N., Sridhar, S., Sivakumar, R., and Ghosh, S. Earthquake trend prediction using long short-term memory rnn. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) 9 (04 2019), 1304.
- Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 1 (Oct. 2001), 5–32.
- Geller, R., Jackson, D., Kagan, Y., and Mulargia, F. Earthquakes cannot be predicted. Science 275 (1997), 1616 – 1616.
- Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-r., and Hinton, G. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (2013), pp. 6645–6649.
- Hochreiter, S., and Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9 (12 1997), 1735–80.
- Kuyuk, H. S., and Susumu, O. Real-time classifification of earthquake using deep learning. Procedia Computer Science 140 (2018), 298–305.
- Li, A., and Kang, L. Knn-based modeling and its application in aftershock prediction. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Asia Symposium on Intelligent Interaction and Affffective Computing (USA, 2009), ASIA ’09, IEEE Computer Society, p. 83–86.
- Mallouhy, R., Abou Jaoude, C., Guyeux, C., and Makhoul, A. Major earthquake event prediction using various machine learning algorithms. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Disaster Management (Paris, France, Dec. 2019).
- Shearer, P. M. Introduction to Seismology, 2 ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
- Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfifitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15 (06 2014), 1929–1958.
- USGS. Signifificant earthquakes - 2021. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/browse/signifificant.php. ”Accessed: 2021-17-06”.
- Zhang, A., Lipton, Z. C., Li, M., and Smola, A. J. Dive into Deep Learning. 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRSET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.